<html><body>If you are using OSM data for routing, you must do some modifications to obtain routable network with correct topology. I think creating this routable network from original OSM data means creating Derivative Database, even if you are not adding any new information into data set. Routable network based on OSM data contains much more road segments than original data set.<br/><p>---------- Původní zpráva ----------<br/>Od: Paul Norman <penorman@mac.com><br/>Komu: legal-talk@openstreetmap.org<br/>Datum: 6. 1. 2015 20:42:06<br/>Předmět: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] OSM based GPS navigations and ODbl license of
OSM data</p><br/><blockquote>On 1/6/2015 11:01 AM, Karel Charvat wrote:<br/>> Are the developers of Be-On-Road fullfilling their ODbl license <br/>> obligations by providing their data only in files with unknown format?<br/>It depends. If they are not adding any data, they can simply point to <br/>the source (planet.osm.org).<br/><br/>If they are adding data, they need to provide the entire derivative <br/>database (4.6.a) or an alteration file (4.6.b) with the new contents. <br/>Based on my experience, I would be surprised if they had non-OSM data in <br/>a derivative database. Far more common is to layer OSM data with other data.<br/><br/>It would be nice if be-on-the-road documented their format and provided <br/>open-source tools to use it, but this is not a legal requirement. The <br/>ODbL is concerned with preserving the openness of the data, not of the <br/>data format.<br/><br/>They of course need to meet the other obligations of the ODbL (e.g. <br/>attribution).<br/><br/>_______________________________________________<br/>legal-talk mailing list<br/>legal-talk@openstreetmap.org<br/>https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk</blockquote></body></html>