<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>13 Dec 2019, 09:48 by frederik@remote.org:<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div>I end up with a database of "streets that have at least one pub". This<br></div><div>database does not include OSM data.<br></div><div><br></div><div>In my eyes, though, it is still *derived* from OSM data. It is the<br></div><div>result of an algorithmic process that has made use of OSM data; if you<br></div><div>will, the OSM data residue is in the name/description of my new<br></div><div>database: "roads with pubs". It is derived from OSM; it could not have<br></div><div>been made without OSM.<br></div></blockquote><div>Or more extreme. <br></div><div><br></div><div>(1) I create database of points on the grid of 0.1 cm.<br></div><div>(2) I create two list, first contains what according to OSM is on land,<br></div><div>second contains what according to OSM data is water<br></div><div>(3) I claim that both lists are not ODBL licenced.<br></div><div><br></div><div>Are you going to claim that also this one is legally sound, and not Mapbox-tier <br></div><div>"attribution hidden behind mystery meat "(i)" navigation <br></div><div>fulfills ODBL attribution requirement" swindle?<br></div> </body>
</html>