<div dir="ltr"><div>Nuno -<br></div><div>I do not see how Matthias's usecase qualifies as "AND you have <u>added
          to or enhanced our data</u>" since the houses and flat and their prices are *not* added to OSM houses or flats, but if this FAQ answer is misleading, we should rewrite this FAQ answer to more accurate reflect ODbL.  </div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 11:45 AM Nuno Caldeira <<a href="mailto:nunocapelocaldeira@gmail.com">nunocapelocaldeira@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
  
    
  
  <div bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
    <p><font face="Arial">well
<a href="https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licence/Licence_and_Legal_FAQ#The_OpenStreetMap_Geodata_Licence" target="_blank">https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licence/Licence_and_Legal_FAQ#The_OpenStreetMap_Geodata_Licence</a></font></p>
    <p>
      </p><blockquote type="cite">Secondly, you <b>"Share Alike"</b>. If
        you do not make any changes to OpenStreetMap data, then you are
        unlikely to have a "Share Alike" obligation. But, if you <u>publicly
          distribute something that you have made</u> from our data,
        such as a <u>map or another database</u>, AND you have <u>added
          to or enhanced our data</u>, then we want you to make those
        additions publicly available. We obviously prefer it if you
        added the data straight back to our database, but you do not
        have to, <u>as long as the public can easily get a copy of what
          you have done.</u> If you do not publicly distribute anything,
        then you do not have to share anything. </blockquote>
      <br>
    <p></p>
    <div>Às 19:34 de 13/12/2019, Kathleen Lu via
      legal-talk escreveu:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite">
      
      <div dir="ltr">
        <div>
          <div>Nuno - I think you are operating under the mistaken
            assumption that a CC-BY-SA license would mean that uses such
            as Mattias's would require sharealike. <br>
          </div>
          <div><br>
          </div>
          <div>Here's CC-BY-SA's definition of a Derivative Work:</div>
          <div><strong style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:verdana,sans-serif;font-size:11px;font-style:normal;font-variant-ligatures:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;letter-spacing:normal;text-align:left;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:normal;word-spacing:0px;background-color:rgb(255,255,204);text-decoration-style:initial;text-decoration-color:initial">"Derivative
              Work"</strong><span style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:verdana,sans-serif;font-size:11px;font-style:normal;font-variant-ligatures:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;font-weight:400;letter-spacing:normal;text-align:left;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:normal;word-spacing:0px;background-color:rgb(255,255,204);text-decoration-style:initial;text-decoration-color:initial;display:inline;float:none"><span> </span>means
              a work based upon the Work or upon the Work and other
              pre-existing works, such as a translation, musical
              arrangement, dramatization, fictionalization, motion
              picture version, sound recording, art reproduction,
              abridgment, condensation, or any other form in which the
              Work may be recast, transformed, or adapted, except that a
              work that constitutes a Collective Work will not be
              considered a Derivative Work for the purpose of this
              License. For the avoidance of doubt, where the Work is a
              musical composition or sound recording, the
              synchronization of the Work in timed-relation with a
              moving image ("synching") will be considered a Derivative
              Work for the purpose of this License.</span></div>
          <div><br>
          </div>
          Here's CC-BY-SA's definition of a Collective Work:<br>
          <div><span style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:verdana,sans-serif;font-size:11px;font-style:normal;font-variant-ligatures:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;font-weight:400;letter-spacing:normal;text-align:left;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:normal;word-spacing:0px;background-color:rgb(255,255,204);text-decoration-style:initial;text-decoration-color:initial;display:inline;float:none"><strong style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:verdana,sans-serif;font-size:11px;font-style:normal;font-variant-ligatures:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;letter-spacing:normal;text-align:left;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:normal;word-spacing:0px;background-color:rgb(255,255,204);text-decoration-style:initial;text-decoration-color:initial">"Collective
                Work"</strong><span style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:verdana,sans-serif;font-size:11px;font-style:normal;font-variant-ligatures:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;font-weight:400;letter-spacing:normal;text-align:left;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:normal;word-spacing:0px;background-color:rgb(255,255,204);text-decoration-style:initial;text-decoration-color:initial;display:inline;float:none"><span> </span>means
                a work, such as a periodical issue, anthology or
                encyclopedia, in which the Work in its entirety in
                unmodified form, along with a number of other
                contributions, constituting separate and independent
                works in themselves, are assembled into a collective
                whole. A work that constitutes a Collective Work will
                not be considered a Derivative Work (as defined below)
                for the purposes of this License.</span></span></div>
          <br>
        </div>
        <div>As you can see from these examples (which focus on creative
          derivatives, since facts are not even copyrightable in the US
          and there is no US database protection law), a "derivative
          work" needs quite a bit of the original to qualify. The
          meaning of a "derivative work" was always much narrower than
          what a colloquial understanding of what "derived" might be,
          and the change in license did not change that. <br>
        </div>
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div>-Kathleen<br>
        </div>
        <div><br>
          <br>
          <span style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:verdana,sans-serif;font-size:11px;font-style:normal;font-variant-ligatures:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;font-weight:400;letter-spacing:normal;text-align:left;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:normal;word-spacing:0px;background-color:rgb(255,255,204);text-decoration-style:initial;text-decoration-color:initial;display:inline;float:none"></span></div>
      </div>
      <br>
      <div class="gmail_quote">
        <div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 11:11
          AM Nuno Caldeira <<a href="mailto:nunocapelocaldeira@gmail.com" target="_blank">nunocapelocaldeira@gmail.com</a>>
          wrote:<br>
        </div>
        <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
          <div dir="auto">these new Liberal interpretation of ODbL are
            funny. to bad it's not documented what we wanted when we
            changed license. seems to be full of lies 
            <div dir="auto"><br>
            </div>
            <div dir="auto"><a href="https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licence/Historic/We_Are_Changing_The_License" target="_blank">https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licence/Historic/We_Are_Changing_The_License</a>
              <div dir="auto"><i><br>
                </i></div>
              <div dir="auto"><i>"This means that “good guys” are
                  stopped from using our data but the “bad guys” may be
                  able to use it anyway." </i></div>
              <div dir="auto"><i><br>
                </i></div>
              <div dir="auto"><i>" We believe that a reasonable
                  consensus has been built that our current progress
                  should be to maintain a Share-Alike license (see more
                  below) but have it written explicitly for data."</i></div>
              <div dir="auto"><i><br>
                </i></div>
              <div dir="auto"><i>"Both licenses are “By Attribution” and
                  “Share Alike”." </i></div>
              <div dir="auto"><i><br>
                </i></div>
              <div dir="auto"><i>"But what happens if the Foundation is
                  taken over by people with commercial interests?</i></div>
              <ul>
                <li><i>You still own the rights to any data you
                    contribute, not the Foundation. In the new
                    Contributor Terms, you license the Foundation to
                    publish the data for others to use and ONLY under a
                    free and open license.</i></li>
              </ul>
              <ul>
                <li><i>The Foundation is not allowed to take your
                    contribution and release it under a commercial
                    license.</i></li>
              </ul>
              <ul>
                <li><i>If the Foundation fails to publish under only a
                    free and open license, it has broken its contract
                    with you. A copy of the existing data can be made
                    and released by a different body.</i></li>
              </ul>
              <ul>
                <li><i>If a change is made to another free and open
                    license, it is active contributors who decide yes or
                    no, not the Foundation."</i></li>
              </ul>
              <div dir="auto"><br>
              </div>
            </div>
          </div>
          <br>
          <div class="gmail_quote">
            <div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Fri, 13 Dec 2019, 18:56
              Frederik Ramm, <<a href="mailto:frederik@remote.org" target="_blank">frederik@remote.org</a>>
              wrote:<br>
            </div>
            <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">Hi,<br>
              <br>
              On 13.12.19 19:28, Kathleen Lu via legal-talk wrote:<br>
              > “Derivative Database” – Means a database based upon
              the Database, and<br>
              > includes any translation, adaptation, arrangement,
              modification, or any<br>
              > other alteration of the Database or of a Substantial
              part of the<br>
              > Contents.<br>
              <br>
              Interesting. I knew the ODbL text but I have always
              glossed over this<br>
              definition, assuming that "well you know what derived
              means".<br>
              <br>
              I'll have to ponder this for a while, it changes some
              assumptions I had<br>
              made. It would mean that, for example, a database that
              contains a count<br>
              of all pubs in each municipality, or a database that
              contains the<br>
              average travel time from a building in a city to the
              nearest hospital,<br>
              or a heatmap of ice cream parlours, would not fall under
              the ODbL<br>
              because these, while derived from OSM, do not actually
              contain a copy of<br>
              anything in OSM (and neither could they possibly be used
              to reassemble<br>
              OSM).<br>
              <br>
              I had until now assumed that such works would definitely
              fall under the<br>
              ODbL but you are right, they don't really fit the
              "Derivative Database"<br>
              definition.<br>
              <br>
              Bye<br>
              Frederik<br>
              <br>
              -- <br>
              Frederik Ramm  ##  eMail <a href="mailto:frederik@remote.org" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">frederik@remote.org</a> 
              ##  N49°00'09" E008°23'33"<br>
              <br>
              _______________________________________________<br>
              legal-talk mailing list<br>
              <a href="mailto:legal-talk@openstreetmap.org" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">legal-talk@openstreetmap.org</a><br>
              <a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk</a><br>
            </blockquote>
          </div>
          _______________________________________________<br>
          legal-talk mailing list<br>
          <a href="mailto:legal-talk@openstreetmap.org" target="_blank">legal-talk@openstreetmap.org</a><br>
          <a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk</a><br>
        </blockquote>
      </div>
      <br>
      <fieldset></fieldset>
      <pre>_______________________________________________
legal-talk mailing list
<a href="mailto:legal-talk@openstreetmap.org" target="_blank">legal-talk@openstreetmap.org</a>
<a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk" target="_blank">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk</a>
</pre>
    </blockquote>
  </div>

_______________________________________________<br>
legal-talk mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:legal-talk@openstreetmap.org" target="_blank">legal-talk@openstreetmap.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk</a><br>
</blockquote></div>