<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div>Thanks for confirmation of address handling!<br></div><div><br></div><div>In this case I ignored how booking classified it, just<br></div><div>interpreted fact that you rent entire building at once<br></div><div>(there is a single rentable apartment for a property)<br></div><div>and provided images, making clear that you rent<br></div><div>entire cottage making it tourism=chalet<br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Jan 7, 2021, 21:46 by kathleen.lu@mapbox.com:<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div>I would not copy the address from booking.com if the original is wrong<br></div><div>(though confirmation is okay if the original is correct).<br></div><div>Classification I think you can rely on your own judgement rather than<br></div><div>booking.com's. I wouldn't expect theirs to be more reliable since they<br></div><div>can have their own classification criteria that could differ from<br></div><div>OSM's.<br></div><div><br></div><div>On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 1:29 PM Mateusz Konieczny via legal-talk<br></div><div><legal-talk@openstreetmap.org> wrote:<br></div><blockquote><div><br></div><div>Name is from note.<br></div><div><br></div><div>Confirmation of existence and location would be from booking.com,<br></div><div>as note failed to make it clear (mentions different address than its location).<br></div><div><br></div><div>Chalet classification would be based on booking info (what kind of<br></div><div>accommodation can be rented).<br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Jan 5, 2021, 22:21 by kathleen.lu@mapbox.com:<br></div><div><br></div><div>I'm rather confused by what you are saying you would be copying.<br></div><div>The name and address are from the note, not booking.com<br></div><div>Use of the tourism=chalet vs the tourism=hotel tag appears to be your<br></div><div>opinion based on OSM tagging schemes and looking at the photographs,<br></div><div>not a booking.com data entry. Based on the URL, booking.com appears to<br></div><div>think it's a hotel.<br></div><div><br></div><div>On Wed, Dec 23, 2020 at 6:11 AM Mateusz Konieczny via legal-talk<br></div><div><legal-talk@openstreetmap.org> wrote:<br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>As I understand, copying parts or individual entries from booking.com<br></div><div>would be against rules.<br></div><div><br></div><div>But I want to confirm this before documenting or claiming this elsewhere.<br></div><div><br></div><div>Use case:<br></div><div><br></div><div>https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2465448 was opened reporting<br></div><div>existence of a hotel<br></div><div><br></div><div>Based on mapped address I located its entrance at booking.com<br></div><div>and equivalent websites<br></div><div><br></div><div>Using that I established that tourism=chalet operates there under<br></div><div>the name reported by note.<br></div><div><br></div><div>Can I create tourism=chalet object on the OSM?<br></div><div><br></div><div>I expect not, as it would be copying part of booking.com database -<br></div><div>and even if my copying would not be systematic, then many mappers copying<br></div><div>different entries would become a systematic copying.<br></div><div>_______________________________________________<br></div><div>legal-talk mailing list<br></div><div>legal-talk@openstreetmap.org<br></div><div>https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk<br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>_______________________________________________<br></div><div>legal-talk mailing list<br></div><div>legal-talk@openstreetmap.org<br></div><div>https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk<br></div></blockquote></blockquote><div><br></div> </body>
</html>