<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div>I would start from trying to contact relevant mappers, though I am not optimistic that it would<br></div><div dir="auto">end in discovering that the relevant data can stay.<br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">But I can imagine various kind of mistakes ending in valid data being tagged source=Google<br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Jul 24, 2021, 16:19 by mappinglander@gmail.com:<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div dir="ltr"><div>Hello,<br></div><div>There has recently been a discussion in OSM Discord about <a href="https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/source=Google%2C 2010-01-21" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">source=Google tags</a> in Haiti. The usage seems to have documented at <a href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Haiti/Imagery_and_data_sources/Old#Google_Imagery" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">wiki</a>, but seems like there isn't any explicit clauses about allowing to OSM on the linked mailinglist posts, and the Google page says "Use restricted to non-commercial use in or related to Haitian relief efforts." Also, as that was before the CC BY-SA and ODbL switch in 2012, I and other users have expressed some doubts about whether we are still having permission to use that source on OSM. I personally haven't contacted Mikel yet, or the other people involved in the discussion and approved the usage on OSM.<br></div></div></blockquote><div dir="auto"><br></div> </body>
</html>