<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<br>
4.2 refers to 2 wrt usage of "OpenStreetMap", the explicit list in
4.1 is simply there to state what the OSMF considers the IP it
controls.<br>
<br>
12, true in person will be expensive, I don't have a strong feeling
about that, anybody else?<br>
<br>
Simon <br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Am 17.10.2013 20:21, schrieb Eugene
Alvin Villar:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAPhqi6+g8pFxZDk2xkwL4tv=ahGnd8Ecx8REpnwx3V2YSDuuhA@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div>
<div>Some comments:<br>
<br>
</div>
(4.2) This seems to imply that the local chapter can use the
"OpenStreetMap Foundation", "OSM Foundation" and "OSMF"
trademarks. I think this can be limited to "OpenStreeMap",
"OSM", and maybe even "State of the Map" and "SotM".<br>
<br>
(12) "to be conducted in person before a certified mediator
agreed by the parties". This seems expensive since an
in-person mediation is required. Who will pay for such
mediation? Unlike in an actual suit where the judge/jury may
award legal fees to one party, there seems to be no cost
provision for mediation.<br>
<br>
</div>
<div>Otherwise, the document is quite good.<br>
<br>
Eugene<br>
</div>
<div>(OSMPH)</div>
<div><br>
</div>
</div>
<div class="gmail_extra"><br>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 5:45 PM, Simon
Poole <span dir="ltr"><<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:simon@osmfoundation.org" target="_blank">simon@osmfoundation.org</a>></span>
wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">As agreed
at the last LCWG meeting, I've reworked the draft agreement
to<br>
contain most of the changes I proposed, see<br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Foundation/Local_Chapters/Agreement"
target="_blank">http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Foundation/Local_Chapters/Agreement</a><br>
<br>
Please review, comment and discuss. The document should not
be<br>
considered the final legal text and insofar you should focus
more on the<br>
general contents and not on specific wording, it will go
through a<br>
formal legal review before being finalized.<br>
<br>
Simon<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Local-chapters mailing list<br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:Local-chapters@openstreetmap.org">Local-chapters@openstreetmap.org</a><br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/local-chapters"
target="_blank">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/local-chapters</a><br>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
</div>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br>
<pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
Local-chapters mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Local-chapters@openstreetmap.org">Local-chapters@openstreetmap.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/local-chapters">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/local-chapters</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>