<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#ffffff">
On 17/03/2011 13:29, Serge Wroclawski wrote:
<blockquote
cite="mid:AANLkTikDEGJKj_NyRpc7EgfBD7bRw+13EodU1PFoNKWB@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:sidewalk">http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:sidewalk</a></blockquote>
<br>
Actually, I probably wouldn't use that tag when mapping (at least
not locally). <br>
<br>
Tagwatch for GB<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://tagwatch.stoecker.eu/Great_britain/En/tags.html">http://tagwatch.stoecker.eu/Great_britain/En/tags.html</a><br>
suggests "footway=both/left/right" etc. is more common:<br>
<br>
<a href="http://tagwatch.stoecker.eu/osmxapi/*[footway=*]"
target="_blank">footway</a> <b><a
href="http://tagwatch.stoecker.eu/osmxapi/*[footway=both]"
target="_blank">both</a></b> (1553), <b><a
href="http://tagwatch.stoecker.eu/osmxapi/*[footway=left]"
target="_blank">left</a></b> (890), <b><a
href="http://tagwatch.stoecker.eu/osmxapi/*[footway=none]"
target="_blank">none</a></b> (837), <b><a
href="http://tagwatch.stoecker.eu/osmxapi/*[footway=no]"
target="_blank">no</a></b> (474), <b><a
href="http://tagwatch.stoecker.eu/osmxapi/*[footway=right]"
target="_blank">right</a></b> (252), <b><a
href="http://tagwatch.stoecker.eu/osmxapi/*[footway=signpost]"
target="_blank">signpost</a></b> (24), <b><a
href="http://tagwatch.stoecker.eu/osmxapi/*[footway=pavement]"
target="_blank">pavement</a></b> (21), <b><a
href="http://tagwatch.stoecker.eu/osmxapi/*[footway=yes]"
target="_blank">yes</a></b> (18), <b><a
href="http://tagwatch.stoecker.eu/osmxapi/*[footway=residential]"
target="_blank">residential</a></b> (10), <b><a
href="http://tagwatch.stoecker.eu/osmxapi/*[footway=subway]"
target="_blank">subway</a></b> (2), <b><a
href="http://tagwatch.stoecker.eu/osmxapi/*[footway=field_edge]"
target="_blank">field_edge</a></b> (2), <b><a
href="http://tagwatch.stoecker.eu/osmxapi/*[footway=sigtnpost]"
target="_blank">sigtnpost</a></b> (1), <b><a
href="http://tagwatch.stoecker.eu/osmxapi/*[footway=desire]"
target="_blank">desire</a></b> (1), <b><a
href="http://tagwatch.stoecker.eu/osmxapi/*[footway=alley]"
target="_blank">alley</a></b> (1), <b><a
href="http://tagwatch.stoecker.eu/osmxapi/*[footway=track]"
target="_blank">track</a></b> (1), <b><a
href="http://tagwatch.stoecker.eu/osmxapi/*[footway=lane]"
target="_blank">lane</a></b> (1), <b><a
href="http://tagwatch.stoecker.eu/osmxapi/*[footway=4]"
target="_blank">4</a></b> (1)<br>
<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Key:sidewalk&action=history">http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Key:sidewalk&action=history</a><br>
seems to have been created a couple of months ago only and doesn't
seem to reflect actual usage<br>
<br>
Tagwatch sees 32 uses of "sidewalk" in GB.<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://tagwatch.stoecker.eu/Great_britain/En/keystats_sidewalk.html">http://tagwatch.stoecker.eu/Great_britain/En/keystats_sidewalk.html</a><br>
<br>
Cheers,<br>
Andy<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>