<div dir="ltr"><div>I've been a supporter for a face-to-face (F2F) meeting from day one. Because in-person meetings are an important ingredient for good teamwork .<br></div><div><br></div><div>I don't want to start another blame-game here, so I keep it to myself. What did I do. For example: January 19th I've proposed this to the board:</div><div><br></div><div><i>"<span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px">Like I mentioned during our last Board meeting, I feel</span><span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px"> </span><span class="" style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px">we</span><span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px"> </span><span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px">need to have a F2F the sooner the better. </span></i></div><div style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px"><i><br></i></div><div style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px"><i>However, looking at the responses so far, it looks like it's going to be an extended Board meeting. When <span class="">we</span> do that, <span class="">we</span>'re still ignoring the elephant in the room and the result will be a self fulfilling prophecy. </i></div><div style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px"><br></div><div><i><span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px">In order to make it a succes,</span><span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px"> </span><span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px">we</span><span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px"> </span><span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px">need to use the weekend to take a step back and touch base again. Find out what brings us together; our common ideals; why</span><span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px"> </span><span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px">we</span><span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px"> </span><span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px">joined the Foundation; why</span><span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px"> </span><span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px">we</span><span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px"> </span><span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px">ran for Board. </span></i></div><div style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px"><i><br></i></div><div style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px"><i><span>We</span> should all ask ourselves questions like:</i></div><div style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px"><i>- How do <span>we</span> each see the project and the Foundation (as an organisation): it's goals, structure, responsibilities.</i></div><div style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px"><i>- What are our (Foundation) main challenges for the coming years.</i></div><div style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px"><i>- What do <span>we</span> need to have / do in order to be able to handle these challenges </i></div><div style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px"><i><br></i></div><div style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px"><i>Currently (at least, that's how I perceive it), <span>we</span> all come up with (or working on) solutions to which the problem or the urgency of it is not seen all of us. </i></div><div style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px"><i><span>We</span> need to have a common understanding of the challenges that are ahead of us in order to deal with them.</i></div><div style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px"><i><br></i></div><div style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px"><i>I know a mediator who is willing to look around in her network to find a suitable facilitator. One that is a complete outsider; who knows no-one of us (including me) and who has no ties with the project / Foundation. But, on the other hand, is experienced in handling these kind of group-processes.<br></i></div><div style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px"><i>I strongly believe <span>we</span> need to have such an outsider to guide us through this process.</i></div><div style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px"><i><br></i></div><div><i><span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px">When no-one has strong objections, I'm willing to organise this. Or if someone else feels he/she is better suited to pursue this, that's fine with me as well.</span>"</i></div><div><br></div><div>I'm still a strong supporter of a F2F and I will continue to be an advocate within the next board to have one as soon as possible. And no, you don't need to become each others BFF.</div><div><br></div><div>Also, I'd like the next chairman to be a person who can bring people together. Who can motivate people. Who can build bridges. Further I'd like to see how we can use the individual qualities of all board members to make OSM better, to make the OSMF better, to make the board better. Those Belkin or Insights Discovery methods can be of good help with that, thanks for the tip.</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Henk</div><div><i><br></i></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">2014-10-26 15:55 GMT+01:00 Johan & Marguerite <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:textline@gmail.com" target="_blank">textline@gmail.com</a>></span>:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">2014-10-26 14:40 GMT+01:00 <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:steve@asklater.com" target="_blank">steve@asklater.com</a>></span>:<span class=""><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;padding-left:1ex;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid">
<div dir="ltr">
<div style="font-family:"Calibri","Segoe UI","Meiryo","Microsoft YaHei UI","Microsoft JhengHei UI","Malgun Gothic","sans-serif";font-size:12pt" dir="ltr">
<div>Why don't we make the discussions here about ideas and models for how the OSMF could work instead of personalities and trying to blame people for our failings? It's sad reading “manifestos” that are really just negative historical accounts instead of narratives of how to make things better.</div><div><br></div><div>Trying to blow someone’s candle out doesn't make yours any brighter.<br></div><div><div><br></div></div></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div></span><div>As an ordinary osmf member, I wonder what the fuck is happening here. Henk is "attacked on my integrity". Frederik is "frustrated". Simon resigns because Steve is a candidate. And Steve is being attacked immediately after standing for elections. Then I read that the board in the past two years has not been able to make a decision on face-to-face meetings, is having problems dividing tasks who's responsible for membership database, is having problems sharing information on the memberships, has difficulties in the way meeting minutes are drawn up and is not in control of finances/financial risks. Where it looks like person A constantly wanting to steer to the left and B to the right, because A wants to go left.</div><div><br></div><div>I know some of the board members, and I know they are smart. But it seems being smart is not good enough to get the board out of its problems. The above things are a symptom for an underlying problem. I completely miss soft skills in this discussion. Have for example Henk and Frederik already tried to say five positive points about each other, and to each other, in the past two years? Has anyone in the board facilitated cooperation, respect, culture and teamwork? The IQ is there, but where is the EQ?</div><span class=""><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;padding-left:1ex;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid"><div dir="ltr"><div style="font-family:"Calibri","Segoe UI","Meiryo","Microsoft YaHei UI","Microsoft JhengHei UI","Malgun Gothic","sans-serif";font-size:12pt" dir="ltr"><div><div></div><div>In that vein, I think a key to making the board work is to meet in person with a facilitator. We used to do this (but never used a facilitator). It's clear that the strong personalities without trust has led to fragility of the board. Meeting in person used to be a highlight of the board. A chance to get to know each other and understand how each other communicates, and what's important to them.</div><div><br></div><div>Let’s restate the mission and understand why we're here. There have been long threads on stagnation. Let's understand why people feel that way and turn it around. Let's make the best map possible.</div><div><br></div><div>Let’s make SOTM central to the OSMF again. It's the key place community members meet from across the world to share ideas and talk about what mapping they've done. It's a chance for OSM to push new boundaries and engage new communities.</div><div><br></div><div>Let’s find a way to use paid staff to give the board bandwidth and plug holes. To facilitate volunteers not to replace them. Let's use the knowledge and experience of people who've done that before (there are some on the board) to avoid past mistakes.</div><div><br></div><div>Steve</div><div><br></div></div></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div></span><div>When a board fails to be competent enough on details like division of tasks, setting up face-to-face meetings, transparancy and finances then I presume the coming 12 months till the next election will be needed to make the board healthy and competent, in order to make the leap to dealing with the real problems. Solving these real problems can do without respectless battling each other on arguments. World War 1 ended up in trenches. The current board ended up in trenches. There is a real risk that the new board will end up in trenches again. For the coming year, I'm against goals (that I also find crucial for the future of OSM) like restating a mission, getting paid staff in etcetera. </div><div><br></div><div>In the past I've done things like Belbin and Insights Discovery. Just take a look at pages like <a href="https://bemycareercoach.com/soft-skills/list-soft-skills.html" target="_blank">https://bemycareercoach.com/soft-skills/list-soft-skills.html</a> and <a href="http://www.inside-inspiration.com.au/insights-discovery/insights-colour-energies.html#.VE0D5E10yUk" target="_blank">http://www.inside-inspiration.com.au/insights-discovery/insights-colour-energies.html#.VE0D5E10yUk</a></div><div>These are tools helping a team functioning better. </div><div><br></div><div>So, a question to all candidates for the coming election: what will you do to make the board run as a team?</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Cheers, Johan</div><div>aka It's so funny</div><div>The Netherlans</div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;padding-left:1ex;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid">_______________________________________________<br>
osmf-talk mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:osmf-talk@openstreetmap.org" target="_blank">osmf-talk@openstreetmap.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osmf-talk" target="_blank">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osmf-talk</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div></div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
osmf-talk mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:osmf-talk@openstreetmap.org">osmf-talk@openstreetmap.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osmf-talk" target="_blank">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osmf-talk</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br><div> </div><div>Board member</div><div>OpenStreetMap Foundation</div><div>+31 6 4808 8925</div><div><a href="mailto:henk.hoff@osmfoundation.org" target="_blank">henk.hoff@osmfoundation.org</a></div><div> </div><div>Name & Registered Office:</div><div>Openstreetmap Foundation</div><div>132 Maney Hill Road</div><div>Sutton Coldfield</div><div>B72 1JU</div><div>United Kingdom</div><div>A company limited by guarantee, registered in England and Wales.</div><div>Registration No. 05912761.</div>
</div>