<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
  </head>
  <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
    <p>The survey is going to be skewed in many ways for example by
      higher participation from people associated with organisations
      with a vested interest in paid/organized editing. I don't really
      think anybody was even remotely assuming that this was going to be
      representative (doing a representative survey would face many many
      challenges in any case), but more simply a rough gathering of
      sentiment on the issue. Given that, I think we can live with the
      slight advantage we've given to English speakers. Just as with the
      suggestion to have the questions vetted by the community in
      advance, there is just so much bureaucracy that  you can apply to
      such a simple action without it becoming too heavyweight to ever
      happen. <br>
    </p>
    <p>Simon<br>
    </p>
    <br>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">Am 08.10.2017 um 10:28 schrieb Manfred
      A. Reiter:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAEsUX0+QKX_KWvWFcnEzEJ1VTmkQFa9_PcH2CDbcYQ-OznsrgQ@mail.gmail.com">
      <div dir="ltr">Hi Allan, *,
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div>
          <div>One of my biggest reservations is the fact that the
            survey is being conducted in English only.</div>
          <div><br>
          </div>
          <div>From my work for weeklyOSM I know for sure that many
            contributors from French-speaking cultural circles or
            speakers from Latin America will certainly be overwhelmed by
            the survey in English. The same applies to many of the
            German-speaking contributors I have spoken to.</div>
          <div><br>
          </div>
          <div>In this way, the result will certainly not be
            representative.</div>
          <div><br>
          </div>
          <div>cheers </div>
          <div>
            <div class="gmail_extra"><br>
              <div class="gmail_quote">2017-10-08 9:37 GMT+02:00 Allan
                Mustard <span dir="ltr"><<a
                    href="mailto:allan@mustard.net"
                    moz-do-not-send="true">allan@mustard.net</a>></span>:<br>
                <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px
                  0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid
                  rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
                  <div bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
                    <p><font face="Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif">Dear
                        Friends,</font></p>
                    <p><font face="Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif">I just
                        took the survey, and have to say that my
                        graduate degree in agricultural economics, which
                        included a course in survey sampling and
                        statistical methods, informed me that there was
                        not a lot of bias in the survey, with all due
                        respect to my OSM volunteer colleagues who have
                        raised objections to it.  IMHO the survey
                        addresses a very real problem of correcting
                        problems inserted by paid organized mappers
                        (with which I have had to contend more than once
                        in mapping the distant, largely unheard of
                        country of Turkmenistan), who are thousands of
                        miles away, and base their edits on
                        five-year-old Bing imagery coupled with gross
                        assumptions of what the ground truth would
                        reveal.</font></p>
                    <p><font face="Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif">Could
                        the survey have been designed better?  Yes,
                        probably it could have been, had we engaged some
                        social scientists with Ph.D.s in statistical
                        survey techniques, but for the OSM Foundation's
                        purposes, this survey will likely prove adequate
                        to gauge the opinions of the mapping community. 
                        I'm glad I had the opportunity to voice my
                        opinion about something that irritates
                        me--having to fix errors inserted by people who
                        aren't within a thousand miles of here, but
                        think they know what they are doing.</font></p>
                    <p><font face="Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif">Warm
                        regards to all, best regards from sunny
                        Ashgabat--and be sure to look up my Mapillary
                        images from this weekend of a trip to see the
                        longest dinosaur tracks in the world, once my
                        smartphone finishes uploading them!</font></p>
                    <p><font face="Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif">cheers,<br>
                        apm-wa (Allan Mustard)<br>
                      </font></p>
                    <br>
                    <div
                      class="gmail-m_-8220345370152609831moz-cite-prefix">On
                      10/6/2017 1:01 PM, Frederik Ramm wrote:<br>
                    </div>
                    <blockquote type="cite">
                      <pre>Everyone,

On 20.09.2017 06:50, Paul Norman wrote:
</pre>
                      <blockquote type="cite">
                        <pre>The Data Working Group is conducting a survey as part of its work on a
policy covering paid mapping.
</pre>
                      </blockquote>
                      <pre>We plan to close the survey on Sunday night (at 23:59:59 UTC), that's 2
days and 16 hours from now. We'll then take some time to analyze the
results and share them with you, then draft a policy informed by the
results and the discussion here and elsewhere, and present that for
further discussion.

Bye
Frederik</pre>
                    </blockquote>
                  </div>
                </blockquote>
              </div>
              -- <br>
              <div class="gmail_signature">
                <div dir="ltr">
                  <div>
                    <div dir="ltr">
                      <div dir="ltr">
                        <div dir="ltr">
                          <div dir="ltr">
                            <div dir="ltr">
                              <div dir="ltr">
                                <div dir="ltr">## Manfred Reiter - -<br>
                                  ## N 49° 25' 11.028" E 06° 50'
                                  47.328" </div>
                                <div dir="ltr">## <a
                                    href="http://www.weeklyOSM.eu"
                                    moz-do-not-send="true">www.weeklyOSM.eu</a><br>
                                </div>
                              </div>
                            </div>
                          </div>
                        </div>
                      </div>
                    </div>
                  </div>
                </div>
              </div>
            </div>
          </div>
        </div>
      </div>
      <br>
      <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
      <br>
      <pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
osmf-talk mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:osmf-talk@openstreetmap.org">osmf-talk@openstreetmap.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osmf-talk">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osmf-talk</a>
</pre>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
  </body>
</html>