<div dir="ltr"><div><div><div><div><div><div><div><div><div>Hi,<br></div><div><br></div><div>For
me the code of conduct is just set of guidelines, not rules, we as a
community try to live by related to how we treat each other. It's more
of a 'declaration of intent' that we all agree upon, something we can
point to when things start to get out of hand. Everyone makes mistakes
and that should be reflected in how we handle people not following the
code we agree upon.<br><br></div>For me enforcement is secondary to the
'declaration of intent' every member makes towards his/her fellow
members. In other words, it's better to convince everyone to follow the
code then to try and enforce it.<br><br></div>On the freedom of speech issue:<br><br></div>I
haven't come across a point that I couldn't express in a respectful
way, even when there is something difficult to say. Language is an issue
yes, perhaps we should think about the language issue some more but it
shouldn't be an excuse.<br></div><br></div>I find this relevant in the discussion:<span class="m_-6988934228830207860m_-1291023908027387400gmail-im"><br><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">Now I do make the admission that for somebody that has never been
involved in OSM in an active way before, being dropped on to this
mailing list has to be bewildering, which goes for any mailing
list in times of high traffic, but to turn it in to an essentially
moderated list on which you don't dare raise issues or say your
mind because you might frighten somebody away that doesn't have
the context of the discussion yet, cannot be the solution. Maybe
we should simply revive osmf-announce and not automatically
subscribe everybody to this list, though I'm sure that will simply
result in people complaining that they are being cut out of
important discussions.</blockquote><div><br></div></span><div>I
disagree with this because I read this as 'if you can't handle it,
leave' (or don't join) this list, it places all responsibility with those joining, that's exactly the opposite of what we should
do. Those causing people to leave should look at themselves and try and
figure out how to do better or leave themselves.<br></div><div><br></div><div>And
again, we can discuss anything we want related to OSMF even with a code
of conduct, even the issues of the past days, I don't see why not.
Unless we write a bad code or enforce it incorrectly, but let's not do
that.<br></div><div><br></div><div>There is no perfect solution, one
persons freedom ends where another persons freedom begins. In a perfect
world we wouldn't need a code of conduct but I think *with* a code of
conduct, one we can agree upon together and enforce together in the
extremely rare cases it's needed, we will have more discussions and more
diverse points of view then we have now. We won't scare people away and
we won't have to hesitate inviting someone to become a member or warn
them (as I always do). <br></div><div><br></div>I'm always very stressed
to send something to this list and I know others are too. We should fix
that, I consider myself very experienced in the OSMF and someone with a
healthy dose of confidence and if I'm stressed posting to this list I
can't imagine what others are feeling. Just to say, it's not just new
people having issues.<br></div><br></div>If our answer continues to
be 'get over it' or it's the fault of those that can't handle it, then I'm not sure how to continue. Some people have
already left or stopped reading the list but it's not too late.<br><br></div>I
used to be against adopting a code of conduct because of all the same
reasons posted but I have come to see that some of those reasons
don't make sense. Also what's the alternative?<br><br></div>I support
Clifford's initiative, will vote for anyone that supports a code of
conduct and I think the board should support this initiative too. Let's
do this and make sure we get it right.<br><br><div dir="ltr">Cheers,</div>Ben</div>