<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Perhaps, they need data exchange for
bike renting, something like <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://mobike.com/global/">https://mobike.com/global/</a> or for
security. An e-bike may cost quite a lot.<br>
<br>
I used Mobike in a city in Germany while on holiday. It informs
the central server where it is parked, if it is serviceable, if it
is broken what is broken, etc.<br>
<br>
What is a bit frustrating about Mobike is that one can park it
only in a certain area at city center. <br>
<br>
Best regards,<br>
O.<br>
<br>
On 9/3/2018 10:14 AM, Ed Freyfogle wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAGO_zL+WfQ4LgVycXn4zFJguhyvfKwfnZ=KQhtDc+JfZ73H7cw@mail.gmail.com">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<div dir="ltr">
<div dir="ltr">
<div>another 0 bytes option: check out "compass mode" on
Beeline</div>
<div><a href="https://beeline.co/" moz-do-not-send="true">https://beeline.co/</a><br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div dir="ltr">Am Mo., 3. Sep. 2018 um 10:10 Uhr schrieb Dan
Stowell <<a href="mailto:danstowell@gmail.com"
moz-do-not-send="true">danstowell@gmail.com</a>>:<br>
</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">If
navigation is the requirement, at that bandwidth I'd suggest
to do<br>
it with 0 bytes/second, i.e. preload the map data and the
routing<br>
algorithm. I'd suggest the company has a look at how projects
like<br>
OsmAnd provide offline routing<br>
<br>
Dan<br>
<br>
Op ma 3 sep. 2018 om 08:31 schreef Tom Hughes <<a
href="mailto:tom@compton.nu" target="_blank"
moz-do-not-send="true">tom@compton.nu</a>>:<br>
><br>
> I doubt anything mentioned on that site will be of any
use on a<br>
> connection whose speed is measured in bytes/minute.<br>
><br>
> Then again I doubt there is any way to do online routing
over<br>
> such a connection.<br>
><br>
> Tom<br>
><br>
> On 03/09/18 07:37, Oleksiy Muzalyev wrote:<br>
> > Good morning Plnr. Md. Shahriar Alam,<br>
> ><br>
> > If it was not done already, the website <a
href="https://switch2osm.org" rel="noreferrer"
target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">https://switch2osm.org</a>
could be<br>
> > recommended to Ebykes.<br>
> ><br>
> > Best regards,<br>
> > Oleksiy<br>
> ><br>
> > On 03.09.18 07:08, Md Shahriar Alam wrote:<br>
> >> Good day Everybody! A Ebykes service company of
New Zealand wanted to<br>
> >> use OSM and they have asked me about some
bandwidth related issues<br>
> >> with OSM. What should be the answer of their
below Questions If<br>
> >> someone of you know this:<br>
> >><br>
> >> " We're taking a holistic approach that we
believe will dramatically<br>
> >> improve eBikes. We're doing this by drilling
down into all the key<br>
> >> components, to identify better ways of doing
things.<br>
> >><br>
> >> As we're developing our own electric motor
package and control system,<br>
> >> I'm interested in adding features which could be
enabled by accessing<br>
> >> a low cost & power IoT network. Hence, I'm
trying to figure out which<br>
> >> LPWAN technology suits our applications best and
whether these<br>
> >> networks offer sufficient bandwidth to that
offering OpenStreetMap<br>
> >> navigation via the bikes LCD touchscreen would
not simply cause a lot<br>
> >> of frustration!<br>
> >><br>
> >> We've been trying to find out the bandwidth
requirements of OSM but so<br>
> >> far I've been unsuccessful. Hence, I thought I'd
see if I could find<br>
> >> someone associated with OSM with the knowledge
to be able to offer<br>
> >> such advice. I thought you looked like such a
person! Is that<br>
> >> something you may be able to help us with?<br>
> >><br>
> >> To give you some idea of the bandwidth of these
network technologies.<br>
> >> LoRa, which is quite a common IoT network seems
to be limited to 50<br>
> >> bytes every 5-10 min for both the up and down
link. The network<br>
> >> operator explains that there is a difference
between what is possible<br>
> >> with the network and what is recommended to get
stable results in all<br>
> >> conditions, so allowing for 50 bytes enables
stable results in all<br>
> >> conditions.<br>
> >><br>
> >> The operator also suggests that the ability of
their network to<br>
> >> provide map function data transfer will depend
on how much data is<br>
> >> transferred, how frequently, and if it is
suitable to be sent as a<br>
> >> discreet data payload."<br>
> >><br>
> >><br>
> >> *Thanks and Regards***<br>
> >><br>
> >> *//**/Plnr. Md. Shahriar Alam /*<br>
> >> */| /**/Sr. Web GIS (Geographic Information
System) Specialist |/*<br>
> >> /GIS Department,/<br>
> >> /Cell:+8801714130159,/<br>
> >> /<br>
> >> /<br>
> >> */| /**/Premium Instructor of Web GIS | /*/<br>
> >> /<br>
> >> /Udemy./*/<br>
> >> /*<br>
> >><br>
> >> /<br>
> >> /<br>
> >></blockquote>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>