<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office"><head><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml><o:OfficeDocumentSettings><o:AllowPNG/><o:PixelsPerInch>96</o:PixelsPerInch></o:OfficeDocumentSettings></xml><![endif]--></head><body>
> <span style="-webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0);">counter the fact that "HOT practically lays claim to all humanitarian work in the OSM context"</span><div><br></div><div>HOT does not make that claim. Frederik preceeded statement by <div><br></div><div>> <span style="-webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0);">The problem is that with the name it has</span><br><br>So there’s an impression, but not fact.</div><div><br></div><div>The history of HOT and the name are missing from this discussion. It would explainany of the tensions here. I’ll write that up soon.<br><br>Mikel<br><p class="yahoo-quoted-begin" style="font-size: 15px; color: #715FFA; padding-top: 15px; margin-top: 0">On Saturday, December 15, 2018, 8:48 AM, Christoph Hormann <chris_hormann@gmx.de> wrote:</p><blockquote class="iosymail">On Saturday 15 December 2018, Gregory wrote:<br clear="none">> What would be wrong with HOT dominating the OSMF Humanitarian Working<br clear="none">> Group?<br clear="none"><br clear="none">Not sure if that is a serious question.<br clear="none"><br clear="none">Frederik suggested a working group as a method to<span style="-webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0);">counter the fact </span><span style="-webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0);">that "HOT practically lays claim to all humanitarian work in the OSM</span><span style="-webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0);"> </span></blockquote><blockquote class="iosymail"><span style="-webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0);">context"</span> by creating a group within the OSMF as "our go-to group for <br clear="none">anything humanitarian".<br clear="none"><br clear="none">A humanitarian working group within the OSMF that is dominated by HOT <br clear="none">(in terms of personell and culture) would do the exact opposite - it <br clear="none">would further alianate all community members and humanitarian <br clear="none">activities that do not want to subordinate themselves to a HOT <br clear="none">dominance.<div class="yqt3135749827" id="yqtfd67517"><br clear="none"><br clear="none">-- <br clear="none">Christoph Hormann<br clear="none"><a shape="rect" href="http://www.imagico.de/" target="_blank">http://www.imagico.de/</a><br clear="none"><br clear="none">_______________________________________________<br clear="none">osmf-talk mailing list<br clear="none"><a shape="rect" ymailto="mailto:osmf-talk@openstreetmap.org" href="mailto:osmf-talk@openstreetmap.org">osmf-talk@openstreetmap.org</a><br clear="none"><a shape="rect" href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osmf-talk" target="_blank">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osmf-talk</a><br clear="none"></div><blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></div></div>
</body></html>