<div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF"><p>One question, <b>not a single</b> one of these, recently called
<b>100 "humans" expressed concern, doubts or showed any sign of
not being able to vote</b>? 100, not 10, 100 that did not
express themselves about not being able to vote. Lets me think
that people in India are very shy indeed. Lucky we got 900 members
and those "100 humans" were just 1/10 of the members. We must be
doing a great job at promotion to get new members with that rush
sign up.<br>
</p></div></blockquote><div>Wait a minute. If any of the individuals *had* shown concern about not being able to vote, wouldn't that have been taken as evidence that they had been part of a conspiracy to manipulate the election? That the individuals didn't express any concern re the election suggests support for Darafei's theory: These individuals agreed to sign up for OSMF (with their employer facilitating signup and payment) in a manner similar to a job-related training or certification. <br></div><div>(Whether their managers had any more sinister plans or not is a separate question, but there's no evidence that the individuals had any intent to do anything.)</div><div>Then the issue blew up with an investigation and lots of questions and speculation, and now they do not want to say anything for fear of saying something "wrong" (whether that is by the listserv's standard or their managers' standard) so they stay silent, or have unsubscribed.</div><div>-Kathleen<br></div><div><br></div></div></div>