<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
</head>
<body>
Have you talked to the Data Working group?<br>
<br>
--<br>
Andrew
<hr style="display:inline-block;width:98%" tabindex="-1">
<div id="divRplyFwdMsg" dir="ltr"><font face="Calibri, sans-serif" style="font-size:11pt" color="#000000"><b>From:</b> Craig Allan <allan@iafrica.com><br>
<b>Sent:</b> 07 February 2019 06:34:49<br>
<b>To:</b> osmf-talk@openstreetmap.org<br>
<b>Subject:</b> [Osmf-talk] Help: Using OSM as a personal GIS</font>
<div> </div>
</div>
<div class="BodyFragment"><font size="2"><span style="font-size:11pt;">
<div class="PlainText">Hi List<br>
<br>
Help. I have someone using OSM for personal GIS work. They are <br>
apparently doing rural planning and maybe EIA analysis. The problem is <br>
that they are adding (planned?) features that do not exist on any of the <br>
photos and apparently falsely tagging to ensure a pretty rendering. <br>
This has been going on for years, but my tolerance has now snapped.<br>
<br>
How do we deal firmly with these things? There are age, race and gender <br>
matters at play too, so very sensitive help is needed.<br>
<br>
If someone can help to point me at the most diplomatic solution, please <br>
write back off-list. This topic will not benefit from the usual flame-wars.<br>
<br>
Craig<br>
<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
osmf-talk mailing list<br>
osmf-talk@openstreetmap.org<br>
<a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osmf-talk">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osmf-talk</a><br>
</div>
</span></font></div>
</body>
</html>