<html><head></head><body>The "retroactive" aspect is somewhat limited given that the issues with the checkbox are long known, see <a href="https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2013/10/15/the-pd-checkbox/">https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2013/10/15/the-pd-checkbox/</a><br><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">Am 4. Oktober 2019 13:32:06 MESZ schrieb Tobias Knerr <osm@tobias-knerr.de>:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<pre class="k9mail">On 02.10.19 22:33, Simon Poole wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 1ex 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid #729fcf; padding-left: 1ex;">- reset the field, agree on what checking it should mean legally (rather<br>tricky), and ask on login to re-decide what the value should be,<br></blockquote><br>This would be my preference, assuming it's legally feasible, because the<br>existence of this checkbox was a major component of the political<br>compromise which got the sizeable camp of PD supporters on board with<br>the idea of changing our license to ODbL in the first place.<br><br>Removing the checkbox (or retroactively interpreting it as legally<br>meaningless, and not taking steps to remedy the situation) feels like<br>breaking the "deal" that was struck back then.<hr>osmf-talk mailing list<br>osmf-talk@openstreetmap.org<br><a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osmf-talk">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osmf-talk</a><br></pre></blockquote></div><br>-- <br>Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Mobiltelefon mit Kaiten Mail gesendet.</body></html>