<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<p><br>
</p>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Às 18:29 de 31/10/2019, Yves escreveu:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:76FF7102-0AA4-4A82-A1A2-B9A7926CF5FA@mailbox.org">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
For me, a 'fair use' of a screenshot in any blog post, imply a
citation of the source material. If the source material is derived
from OSM data, a notice of the OSM source and license is to be
added, at least in the footer. <br>
My concern here is not US law, but in an article about nice maps,
failing to do so tells me a lot about the writing skills of the
author. </blockquote>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>-Obviously, it's a basic academic value. Nothing happens as
mistakes. Worst of this is that it comes from a Corporate Member
of OSMF.</p>
<p><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Corporate_Members">https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Corporate_Members</a></p>
<p>
<blockquote type="cite">
<h3><span class="mw-headline"
id="Foundation_and_community_expectations">Foundation and
community expectations</span></h3>
<p>We expect Corporate Members to conduct themselves as good
citizens of the OpenStreetMap ecosystem, e.g. by complying
with our attribution requirements (<a
href="https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licence/Licence_and_Legal_FAQ"
title="Licence/Licence and Legal FAQ">Licence and Legal FAQ</a>),
following good editing practice and adhering to the
community's guidelines, such as the <a
href="https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licence/Community_Guidelines"
title="Licence/Community Guidelines">Licence/Community
Guidelines</a> and the <a
href="https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines"
title="Organised Editing Guidelines">Organised Editing
Guidelines</a>.
</p>
</blockquote>
But let's be honest, what will happen? Nothing, just blantly
ignore it and fair use it. seems fair<br>
</p>
</body>
</html>