<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
  </head>
  <body>
    <p>"With experience in the community/board" is not the same criteria
      as disallowing current board members, who, imho, should not be
      trying to influence the elections as long as they are a member.</p>
    <p>Simon<br>
    </p>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">Am 16.11.2019 um 13:49 schrieb Heather
      Leson:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAHjf0T+kODGjLUtG8fKwuu5SDsgTdEDUJWfbsXEOfSS7jSvw-w@mail.gmail.com">
      <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
      <div dir="auto">
        <div>Simon, why would you restrict members or people with
          experience in the community/board to not ask questions?</div>
        <div dir="auto">
          <div dir="auto"><br>
          </div>
          <div dir="auto">HeatherĀ </div>
          <br>
          <br>
          <div class="gmail_quote" dir="auto">
            <div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Sat, 16 Nov 2019, 13:36
              Simon Poole, <<a href="mailto:simon@poole.ch"
                moz-do-not-send="true">simon@poole.ch</a>> wrote:<br>
            </div>
            <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
              .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Michael<br>
              <br>
              Thanks for this.<br>
              <br>
              Expecting you to be doing this next time too :-): could we
              put a rule in<br>
              place that doesn't allow questions from candidates and
              current board<br>
              members?<br>
              <br>
              If the candidates want to jokey for position I would
              consider a<br>
              town-hall or similar type of event to be more appropriate
              and fairer,<br>
              instead of giving an advantage to those that get their,
              typically<br>
              loaded, questions to be accepted.<br>
              <br>
              Simon<br>
              <br>
              Am 16.11.2019 um 11:04 schrieb Michael Collinson:<br>
              > I have now produced a collated questions for
              candidates to answer.<br>
              ><br>
              > <a
href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Foundation/AGM19/Election_to_Board"
                rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank"
                moz-do-not-send="true">https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Foundation/AGM19/Election_to_Board</a><br>
              ><br>
              ><br>
              > Candidates, please a rough estimate of how long it
              takes you and let<br>
              > me know. This will help me or future volunteers keep
              it reasonable. My<br>
              > particular concern is the impact on non-native
              English speakers.<br>
              ><br>
              > Thank you to all who posted questions. If you have
              any feedback or<br>
              > concerns about what I have done, please do feel free
              to let me know<br>
              > publicly or privately.<br>
              ><br>
              > --------------<br>
              ><br>
              > OK, that is the announcement done, but for
              transparency, here are some<br>
              > notes on my methodology:<br>
              ><br>
              > I want to strike a balance between candidate's time
              and "censorship",<br>
              > (i.e. not including everyone's questions). I also
              want as much as I<br>
              > can to set a level playing field for non-native
              English-speaking<br>
              > candidates and candidates from non-Western cultures.<br>
              ><br>
              > Last year it took candidates who responded to me at
              least 8 hours to<br>
              > compile answers. Two candidates took well over that.
              I had some<br>
              > thoughtful private feedback from 3 folks who had
              posted community<br>
              > questions. Last year, I generalised questions as much
              as I could and<br>
              > ruthlessly cut anything that was "What is your
              position on X" and not<br>
              > clearly OSM-related. That meant I filtered out
              specificity and had<br>
              > some soul-searching as to what to do with identity
              politics. As a<br>
              > result of the feedback, I have tried something a bit
              different this<br>
              > year: There are more very specific/complex/perhaps
              controversial<br>
              > questions but I have given candidates some choice in
              what questions<br>
              > they want to tackle - so I hope it is not too
              overwhelming. In<br>
              > particular, there is a "What would you do?" section
              where I have taken<br>
              > a number of questions and presented them as if there
              were board agenda<br>
              > items.<br>
              ><br>
              > Last year, Dorothea put the unedited community
              questions below the<br>
              > "official" set. I thought that worked very well for
              transparency and<br>
              > we are repeating it this year.<br>
              ><br>
              > If you are curious about last year's questions, here
              is the link:<br>
              > <a
href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Foundation/AGM18/Election_to_Board#Official_set_of_questions"
                rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank"
                moz-do-not-send="true">https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Foundation/AGM18/Election_to_Board#Official_set_of_questions</a><br>
              ><br>
              ><br>
              > Mike<br>
              ><br>
              ><br>
              ><br>
              > _______________________________________________<br>
              > osmf-talk mailing list<br>
              > <a href="mailto:osmf-talk@openstreetmap.org"
                target="_blank" rel="noreferrer" moz-do-not-send="true">osmf-talk@openstreetmap.org</a><br>
              > <a
                href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osmf-talk"
                rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank"
                moz-do-not-send="true">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osmf-talk</a><br>
              <br>
              _______________________________________________<br>
              osmf-talk mailing list<br>
              <a href="mailto:osmf-talk@openstreetmap.org"
                target="_blank" rel="noreferrer" moz-do-not-send="true">osmf-talk@openstreetmap.org</a><br>
              <a
                href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osmf-talk"
                rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank"
                moz-do-not-send="true">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osmf-talk</a><br>
            </blockquote>
          </div>
        </div>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
  </body>
</html>