<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<p><font face="Arial">Sadly the board won't do anything. By the way
came across this, new way of a fixed reasonable calculated
Mapbox attribution when you click SHOW/HIDE LEGEND.
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.natureindex.com/collaboration-maps/melbourne">https://www.natureindex.com/collaboration-maps/melbourne</a></font></p>
<p><font face="Arial"></font><br>
</p>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 21/12/2019 20:58, Martin
Koppenhoefer wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:0C8751D6-FDF3-46E1-86B2-6462106A5596@gmail.com">
<pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">
sent from a phone
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">On 20. Dec 2019, at 14:41, Nuno Caldeira <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:nunocapelocaldeira@gmail.com"><nunocapelocaldeira@gmail.com></a> wrote:
@Phil Wyatt don't get me wrong, but adding something there is useless. i added Facebook there over one year ago. They don't have shame, no point to add companies there, when there's sites and companies that been there for years without real consequence. It's just a wiki page that most won't ever acknowledge.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">
I disagree on this. Yes, it’s just a wikipage, but at least it documents abusers and our attempts to notify them about their abuse and ask them to respect the license. There are some insistent refusers but generally people do add attribution when pointed to attribution issues.
When companies refuse to respect the license or repeatedly ignore communication attempts it should be duty of the board to look into it.
Cheers Martin </pre>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>