<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office"><head><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml><o:OfficeDocumentSettings><o:AllowPNG/><o:PixelsPerInch>96</o:PixelsPerInch></o:OfficeDocumentSettings></xml><![endif]--></head><body>
<!--[if gte mso 9]><xml><o:OfficeDocumentSettings><o:AllowPNG/><o:PixelsPerInch>96</o:PixelsPerInch></o:OfficeDocumentSettings></xml><![endif]-->
Right we have used google forms, that feeds into google sheets for the evaluation process. Yes we could use another system for form submission, but we would simply move them into sheets. Changing the form submission wouldn’t have any material effect on our current set up. The evaluation process is the key thing where we need to collaboratively score and evaluate. I’m not quite sure if the program tool would help here or not but it’s worth looking into. Open to other alternatives.<div>Mikel<br><p class="yahoo-quoted-begin" style="font-size: 15px; color: #715FFA; padding-top: 15px; margin-top: 0">On Monday, December 23, 2019, 2:31 PM, Christoph Hormann <chris_hormann@gmx.de> wrote:</p><blockquote class="iosymail">On Monday 23 December 2019, Mikel Maron, OSM wrote:<br clear="none">> * we have evaluated open source alternatives for managing the<br clear="none">> scholar assessment process but did not find anything that<br clear="none">> particularly allowed for real time collaboration. Open to suggestions<br clear="none">> for evaluation.<br clear="none"><br clear="none">I am not referring to the scholar assessment process - i have no idea<br clear="none">what software is being used for that. I am - as said - referring to<br clear="none">the application submission form - which in the previous years has been<br clear="none">Google Forms services, which is not Open Source software. If you want<br clear="none">to know about possible Open Source alternatives you might want to ask<br clear="none">the program committee - who use Open Source software for talk<br clear="none">submission, which surely can also be adapted to facilitate scholarship<br clear="none">applications.<br clear="none"><br clear="none">I won't comment in more detail here about the issues of scholar<br clear="none">recruitment and selection in the current program. I have written<br clear="none">extensively about that and summarized the issues in my last mail and it<br clear="none">is up to the powers-that-be (board and SotM-WG members) to decide if<br clear="none">they become active here. I can only say that for myself this has<br clear="none">become a serious issue in my consideration if to visit a future SotM<br clear="none">since i can hardly morally justify my money being used in this way.<div class="yqt6223523346" id="yqtfd74057"><br clear="none"><br clear="none">--<br clear="none">Christoph Hormann<br clear="none"><a shape="rect" href="http://www.imagico.de/" target="_blank">http://www.imagico.de/</a><br clear="none"><br clear="none">_______________________________________________<br clear="none">osmf-talk mailing list<br clear="none"><a shape="rect" ymailto="mailto:osmf-talk@openstreetmap.org" href="mailto:osmf-talk@openstreetmap.org">osmf-talk@openstreetmap.org</a><br clear="none"><a shape="rect" href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osmf-talk" target="_blank">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osmf-talk</a><br clear="none"></div><blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></div>
</body></html>