<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office"><head><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml><o:OfficeDocumentSettings><o:AllowPNG/><o:PixelsPerInch>96</o:PixelsPerInch></o:OfficeDocumentSettings></xml><![endif]--></head><body>
Right, correct. Scoring happens independently without knowledge of others. there’s initial steps to process and distribute applications to score. But then when we need collaboratively make final selections.<div><br></div><div>We are going to have a privacy policy. And will look into whether the program selection system might have what we need to do this, tbd.</div><div><br></div><div>We’ll be posting soon (probably after New Years) asking for people to join for scoring. All interested are welcome.</div><div><br>Mikel<br><p class="yahoo-quoted-begin" style="font-size: 15px; color: #715FFA; padding-top: 15px; margin-top: 0">On Monday, December 23, 2019, 6:15 PM, Christoph Hormann <chris_hormann@gmx.de> wrote:</p><blockquote class="iosymail">On Monday 23 December 2019, Mikel Maron, OSM wrote:<br clear="none">> Right we have used google forms, that feeds into google sheets for<br clear="none">> the evaluation process. Yes we could use another system for form<br clear="none">> submission, but we would simply move them into sheets. Changing the<br clear="none">> form submission wouldn’t have any material effect on our current set<br clear="none">> up.<br clear="none"><br clear="none">It would have the most material effect of not requiring the applicants <br clear="none">to disclose their personal information to a third party company. Of <br clear="none">course you would then have no legal way to provide the data to Google <br clear="none">afterwards without the applicant's consent.<br clear="none"><br clear="none">But using Google services for the scoring is of course a massive problem <br clear="none">on its own even if you ignore the privacy and potential industrial <br clear="none">espionage issues because it essentially excludes people like me from <br clear="none">participating in the scholarship committee because we would never sign <br clear="none">up with Google. Depending on your perspective you might of course <br clear="none">consider that an advantage but it is definitely discriminating and kind <br clear="none">of ironic considering Google being OSMs competition in some ways...<br clear="none"><br clear="none">> The evaluation process is the key thing where we need to <br clear="none">> collaboratively score and evaluate.<br clear="none"><br clear="none">Scoring is by definition done by each reviewer independently. In fact <br clear="none">if reviewers can see each other's scoring results in a collaborative <br clear="none">tool that would usually be considered problematic because it tends to <br clear="none">distort the results and defeats the whole idea of having different <br clear="none">people making independent assessments.<div class="yqt8830748512" id="yqtfd69782"><br clear="none"><br clear="none">-- <br clear="none">Christoph Hormann<br clear="none"><a shape="rect" href="http://www.imagico.de/" target="_blank">http://www.imagico.de/</a><br clear="none"><br clear="none">_______________________________________________<br clear="none">osmf-talk mailing list<br clear="none"><a shape="rect" ymailto="mailto:osmf-talk@openstreetmap.org" href="mailto:osmf-talk@openstreetmap.org">osmf-talk@openstreetmap.org</a><br clear="none"><a shape="rect" href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osmf-talk" target="_blank">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osmf-talk</a><br clear="none"></div><blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></div>
</body></html>