<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office"><head><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml><o:OfficeDocumentSettings><o:AllowPNG/><o:PixelsPerInch>96</o:PixelsPerInch></o:OfficeDocumentSettings></xml><![endif]--></head><body>
> <span style="-webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0);">If is not vote on an AGM, it can be removed at any point by a – currently imaginary – evil board. </span><br><br>This would be ineffective, and the least of my concerns, with the evil board scenario. Stepping back, there’s a really vaguely defined risk assessment of takeover, and that’s ultimately wasting our energy on this topic.<div><br></div><div>The reason why a vote seems unnecessary is because the best course is not to amend the AoA but to amend the member sign up pages. If the feeling is that members should vote on the principle, I guess there’s no harm. To me, it seems self evident that we all want members to make choices of their own free will, so vote seems unnecessary. Again the best place to make this totally clear is in member sign up.<br><br>Mikel<blockquote class="iosymail"><blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></div>
</body></html>