<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>26 Oct 2020, 11:13 by osm-ml@michreichert.de:</div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div>Sustainable Travel Expenses Resolution<br></div><div>--------------------------------------<br></div><div><br></div><div>The Foundation will not pay travel expenses for travel that includes a<br></div><div>flight if there is an option for that person to travel without flying that<br></div><div><br></div><div>* departs or arrives within 4 hours of the flying option's departure or<br></div><div> arrival, and<br></div><div>* does not take more than 6 hours longer than the flying option.<br></div></blockquote><div>So in case of funding travel expense <br></div><div>it would be necessary to select vastly<br></div><div>more expensive alternative if it exists<br></div><div>and matches this requirements?</div><div><br></div><div>Note that travel by train/bus is often<br></div><div>significantly more expensive than<br></div><div>flying on the same route.</div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div>The aim of this resolution is to avoid spending Foundation money for<br></div><div>travelling with a large carbon dioxide footprint if reasonable<br></div><div>alternatives exist.<br></div></blockquote><div>Note that in this proposal (as stated) paying <br></div><div>far more money for car rental, long<br></div><div>distance taxi or vastly more expensive train<br></div><div>is considered as a "reasonable alternative".</div> </body>
</html>