<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Oct 26, 2020, 11:55 by hartmut.holzgraefe@gmail.com:<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div>On 26.10.20 11:36, Mateusz Konieczny via osmf-talk wrote:<br></div><blockquote><div>Note that in this proposal (as stated) paying<br></div><div>far more money for car rental, long<br></div><div>distance taxi<br></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>where did these options come in?<br></div></blockquote><div>"if there is an option for that person to travel without flying"<br></div><div><br></div><div>Anything, no matter how expensive, no matter how absurd, no matter how C02 emitting<br></div><div>must be selected if it is not flight and matches requirements for travel time and departure/arrival<br></div><div>time.<br></div><div><br></div><div>This is a well intentioned but a badly written rigid rule.<br></div><div><br></div><div><a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/osmf-talk/2020-October/007353.html">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/osmf-talk/2020-October/007353.html</a><br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div><br></div><div>Even though they are not explicitly mentioned as non-options, going by car instead of plane would not make any real sense towards climate goals<br></div><div>as -- unless sharing a ride -- cars are in the same CO2 per person kilometer ballpark as planes.<br></div></blockquote><div>And may be also more expensive and more time consuming and more dangerous at the same time.<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><blockquote>or vastly more expensive train is considered as a "reasonable alternative".<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Well, the proposal clearly states that it's prime consideration is environmental impact, not cost ...<br></div></blockquote><div>Yes, I wanted to point out potential for that it may also vastly increase costs and end in absurd cases.<br></div> </body>
</html>