<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Dec 4, 2020, 12:57 by osmf-talk@openstreetmap.org:<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div>Dec 3, 2020, 23:23 by m@priorart.io:<br></div><div><div><blockquote style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;" class="tutanota_quote"><div dir="ltr"><div>Rather than engaging the LWG and asking us to fix it, a completely new draft was created and the LWG has been told on a number of occasions that the Board will be voting imminently on this new draft without LWG input.<br></div></div></blockquote><div>Interesting, I completely missed this. Is that new draft published somewhere?<br></div></div></div></blockquote><div>Yes, it is at <a href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Draft_Attribution_Guideline/2020v2">https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Draft_Attribution_Guideline/2020v2</a><br></div><div><br></div><div>Also, see history and introduction - it is a significant rewrite but it is not written from scratch<br></div><div><a href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Draft_Attribution_Guideline/2020v2&action=history">https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Draft_Attribution_Guideline/2020v2&action=history</a><br></div><div><br></div><div>The most important part is a success - claim that ODBL attribution requirements (noticeable by all)<br></div><div>are waived on mobile is now gone.<br></div><div><br></div><div>It is still problematic in parts (for example it would allow permanent logo of hosting company<br></div><div>while OSM attribution would disappear quickly) but it is a significant improvement over<br></div><div>previous version.<br></div> </body>
</html>