<html><head></head><body>Thanks Tom for putting a number behind this. It would be nice to know if this is a good average number across a timespan.<br><br>In a corporate setting there would be discussion around cost benefit of maintaining something for such low customer base. What I suggest here is to have open discussion around the effort required to maintain compatibility and maybe cherry pick certain easy fixes?<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 4 May 2021 6:44:18 pm AEST, Tom Hughes via osmf-talk <osmf-talk@openstreetmap.org> wrote:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<pre class="k9mail">On 04/05/2021 09:26, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:<br><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 1ex 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid #729fcf; padding-left: 1ex;">sent from a phone<br><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 1ex 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid #ad7fa8; padding-left: 1ex;">On 3 May 2021, at 21:42, Tobias Knerr <osm@tobias-knerr.de> wrote:<br>* Cross-platform: support all major systems and browsers, including IE1<br></blockquote>seriously IE11? Wikipedia says it was the browser for windows 7, which is AFAIK not even supported by microsoft anymore? IMHO we should not invest a single dime in supporting obsolete microsoft web technology.<br>Web developers have been blaming MS for decades because they didn’t adhere to the open standards, but these times are gone now since Edge.<br></blockquote><br>We tracked approximately 7500 editor start actions on the web<br>site yesterday - that's anybody using the edit button so some<br>may be launching an editor using the remote edit protocol but<br>most are probable iD.<br><br>Of those 7500 exactly 6 were using IE.<br><br>Tom<br></pre></blockquote></div></body></html>