<html><head></head><body>To me, the draft guideline is what I expect, and it is clear concerning the issue mentioned : "The attribution format should not require individuals to interact with the map or produced work to see the attribution."<br>I read it that user has to see 'OpenStreetMap' without clicking or tapping a (i), no matter what.<br>Regards,<br>Yves <br><br><div class="gmail_quote">Le 12 juin 2021 15:54:43 GMT+02:00, b.kilhu+ytrwslnopdfujmrtjzkvsxweizfjncifmzdwwypiihjzdikulpnvql+-@gmail.com a écrit :<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<pre dir="auto" class="k9mail">That's an interesting turn of events. We were just discussing this<br>very question. The wording implies that it should be displayed in a<br>place and modality where people are usually looking for it, and this<br>is usually dictated by our competitors. Many of our competitors make<br>the attribution appear if you hover or click on the (i) in the lower<br>right corner. Some always expect an interaction, some only when the<br>viewport is too small but they will make it appear when the viewport<br>is resized as per responsive design. Considering that such maps are<br>interactive and it is expected that users interact with the map, is<br>this not proper?<br><a href="https://github.com/matkoniecz/illegal-use-of-OpenStreetMap/issues/26">https://github.com/matkoniecz/illegal-use-of-OpenStreetMap/issues/26</a><br><br>On Sat, Jun 12, 2021 at 1:14 PM R. A. McCann (OSMF Board)<br><rory.mccann@osmfoundation.org> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 1ex 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid #729fcf; padding-left: 1ex;"><br>Hello OSMF members,<br><br>The OSMF Board has been working on an update to the OSMF's Attribution Guidelines for a little while, and in conjunction with the Licensing Working Group, and external legal counsel, have settled on a draft Guidelines. We would like to share this with you, the OSM(F) community.<br><br>Here's the current draft:<br><a href="https://wiki.osm.org/Draft_Attribution_Guideline/2021v0.9">https://wiki.osm.org/Draft_Attribution_Guideline/2021v0.9</a><br><br>Perhaps the most prominent change compared to previous drafts is the guidance for interactive maps: We set an expectation that attribution is visible for at least some time without user interaction to fall within the safe harbour outlined by the Attribution Guidelines. This was a major point of feedback during previous rounds of consultation.<br><br>The OSMF Board will probably vote to accept this at our next board meeting which is on 14:00 UTC 2021-06-25. This meeting is open to all OSMF Members. More details on this meeting: <a href="https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Board/Minutes/2021-06">https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Board/Minutes/2021-06</a><br><br>The OSMF Board wants to know what you think.<br>If you would like to leave feedback, you can reply to this email, or email the board privately at board@osmfoundation.org<br><br>--<br>R. A. McCann<br>Secretary<br>OpenStreetMap Foundation<br><br>Name & Registered Office:<br>OpenStreetMap Foundation<br>St John’s Innovation Centre<br>Cowley Road<br>Cambridge<br>CB4 0WS<br>United Kingdom<br>A company limited by guarantee, registered in England and Wales<br>Registration No. 05912761<hr>osmf-talk mailing list<br>osmf-talk@openstreetmap.org<br><a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osmf-talk">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osmf-talk</a><br></blockquote><hr>osmf-talk mailing list<br>osmf-talk@openstreetmap.org<br><a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osmf-talk">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osmf-talk</a><br></pre></blockquote></div></body></html>