<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<p><br>
</p>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Am 15.06.2021 um 17:19 schrieb Mateusz
Konieczny via osmf-talk:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite" cite="mid:McFFNnG--3-2@tutanota.com">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<div dir="auto"><br>
</div>
<div dir="auto">But I would expect that if something is <br>
</div>
<div dir="auto">OpenStreetMap data editor and it displays data for
editing<br>
</div>
<div dir="auto">then it is clear that this is OpenStreetMap data.<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>Both JOSM and Vespucci have the ability to load OSM format data
from any source, so no way this is "clear".<br>
</p>
<blockquote type="cite" cite="mid:McFFNnG--3-2@tutanota.com">
<div dir="auto">And that is one of reasons why StreetComplete is
displaying one.<br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>Thanks for the plug. All three editors I mentioned display
attribution for background layers, just as SC does, that's not the
point.</p>
<p>People were just applauding a "no exceptions" statement and the
1st thing that happens is people starting making exceptions
(because that's what happens IRL).</p>
<p>Simon<br>
</p>
<blockquote type="cite" cite="mid:McFFNnG--3-2@tutanota.com">
<div>Jun 15, 2021, 17:00 by <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:simon@poole.ch">simon@poole.ch</a>:<br>
</div>
<blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid
#93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;">
<div>But STOP!<br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>The sky is falling.<br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Neither JOSM, iD nor Vespucci provide correct attribution
for the OSM data they are displaying.<br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Where are those ropes?!!!! iD strikes it lucky again, but
now we have the chance to make the editors devless too!!!!!!!<br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Am 15.06.2021 um 16:02 schrieb Frederik Ramm:<br>
</div>
<blockquote>
<div>Hi,<br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>On 15.06.21 15:56, MoiraPrime via osmf-talk wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote>
<div>If you want to kill any use of OSM on smartwatches...
The two biggest<br>
</div>
<div>users being MyRadar and RadarScope, this would be a
good way to do that<br>
</div>
<div>and kill any goodwill these apps have towards the
project.<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div>Let's not do that, really depend on the good edits people
make with<br>
</div>
<div>Vespucci on their smart watches.<br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Bye<br>
</div>
<div>Frederik<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<div dir="auto"><br>
</div>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">_______________________________________________
osmf-talk mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:osmf-talk@openstreetmap.org">osmf-talk@openstreetmap.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osmf-talk">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osmf-talk</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>