<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Jun 15, 2021, 23:38 by simon@poole.ch: <br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><blockquote type="cite">If
concessions have to be made, maybe we could explicitly tolerate a
short 'OSM' for multi-source maps when the required attributions
is longer than ours alone.<br></blockquote><p>There are lots of ways this could be made to work, matter of fact
I'm fairly sure a CC BY 2.0esquish "Such credit may be implemented
in any reasonable manner; provided, however, that in the case of a
Derivative Work or Collective Work, at a minimum such credit will
appear where any other comparable authorship credit appears and in
a manner at least as prominent as such other comparable authorship
credit." would make lots of OSM contributors quite happy (this
would be the equal treatment you are referring to), but it is by
far not the only avenue that could be taken.<br></p></blockquote><div dir="auto">Main problem here is that many would be perfectly fine with not giving any credit to any map source.<br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">See for example case of OSM data used in taxi app or map app powered by OSM data <br></div><div dir="auto">and map data not requiring attribution.<br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Or hosting company offering premium product where they are not requiring showing their logo,<br></div><div dir="auto">what would allow also hiding OSM attribution.<br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Personally, giving ability to apply "any reasonable manner", without requiring it to be clearly <br></div><div dir="auto">visible to all users allows to de facto have no real attribution.<br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">That will be seen only in case where someone is actively looking for it.<br></div> </body>
</html>