<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div dir="auto">Oct 1, 2024, 08:22 by jwhelan0112@gmail.com:<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div dir="auto"><div dir="auto">There is a new type of computer memory / storage emerging which has the promise to increase database servers performance. Should we have someone on the board who understands about these sort of things?<br></div></div></blockquote><div dir="auto">I would say that person able to talk with sysadmins/OWG etc would be enough.<br></div><div dir="auto">Board really should not be selecting specific memory/CPU/OS for servers, it is <br></div><div dir="auto">kind of work that should be delegated rather than micromanaged by board.<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div dir="auto"><div dir="auto">OSM permits many ways to describe the same thing. Fine but it does mean it's more difficult to find the data. Does the board need access to a subject matter specialist to help clean up the map?<br></div></div></blockquote><div dir="auto">Current approach is that OSMF board is not mapping (as part of official duties,<br></div><div dir="auto">people on OSMF board can map and I personally would prefer ones that map).<br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">As of now tagging discussions are explicitly out of scope, see<br></div><div dir="auto"><a href="https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Mission_Statement#Scope_of_the_OSMF_board" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Mission_Statement#Scope_of_the_OSMF_board</a><br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Though ensuring that we have place where it can be discussed, good default editor<br></div><div dir="auto">is ultimately responsibility of the board.<br></div> </body>
</html>