<p>See for example:</p>

<p><a href="https://trac.openstreetmap.org/ticket/1775">https://trac.openstreetmap.org/ticket/1775</a><br><a href="https://trac.openstreetmap.org/ticket/2176">https://trac.openstreetmap.org/ticket/2176</a><br><a href="https://trac.openstreetmap.org/ticket/2192">https://trac.openstreetmap.org/ticket/2192</a></p>

<p>and probably more that I haven't found.</p>

<p>The key point is that what people want isn't really to hide "large" changesets, for any particular value of large, it's to hide changesets which span the area without touching anything in it.</p>

<p>The key to that is getting OWL running in production and able to give us that information, so if you want to help make the history list more useful then helping out with OWL is the solution.</p>

<p style="font-size:small;-webkit-text-size-adjust:none;color:#666;">—<br>Reply to this email directly or <a href='https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/issues/636#issuecomment-30021755'>view it on GitHub</a>.<img src='https://github.com/notifications/beacon/uTRSc6ihLa7Shf84BpiOpotUrNJy-hXLlEvh_7ZUtNadPJdOmiNvsjwQiS3HzXot.gif' height='1' width='1'></p>