<p>In the meantime, the wikidata tags with prefixes are used more frequently, with <code>operator:wikidata</code> and <code>name:etymology:wikidata</code> leading by far:</p>

<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>#</th>
<th>tag</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>18 972</td>
<td>operator:wikidata</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>14 838</td>
<td>name:etymology:wikidata</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>580</td>
<td>artist:wikidata</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>461</td>
<td>subject:wikidata</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>457</td>
<td>architect:wikidata</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>446</td>
<td>species:wikidata</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>384</td>
<td>brand:wikidata</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>307</td>
<td>network:wikidata</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>…</td>
<td>…</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>

<p>(Source: <a href="https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=:wikidata">TagInfo</a>, data from 2016-08-09 00:58 UTC)</p>

<p>So what do you think? Should we reconsider to add <code>name:etymology:wikidata</code>? I also like <code>species:wikidata</code> (e.g. for trees or other plants).</p>

<p style="font-size:small;-webkit-text-size-adjust:none;color:#666;">—<br />You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.<br />Reply to this email directly, <a href="https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/pull/788#issuecomment-238527767">view it on GitHub</a>, or <a href="https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABWnLTzfFkLuJesnDAnSiJV05Vb4D5gyks5qeGbEgaJpZM4CPvRb">mute the thread</a>.<img alt="" height="1" src="https://github.com/notifications/beacon/ABWnLQWPHz92NMmsI8Qmb7gnhxLgmChSks5qeGbEgaJpZM4CPvRb.gif" width="1" /></p>
<div itemscope itemtype="http://schema.org/EmailMessage">
<div itemprop="action" itemscope itemtype="http://schema.org/ViewAction">
  <link itemprop="url" href="https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/pull/788#issuecomment-238527767"></link>
  <meta itemprop="name" content="View Pull Request"></meta>
</div>
<meta itemprop="description" content="View this Pull Request on GitHub"></meta>
</div>

<script type="application/json" data-scope="inboxmarkup">{"api_version":"1.0","publisher":{"api_key":"05dde50f1d1a384dd78767c55493e4bb","name":"GitHub"},"entity":{"external_key":"github/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website","title":"openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website","subtitle":"GitHub repository","main_image_url":"https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/143418/17495839/a5054eac-5d88-11e6-95fc-7290892c7bb5.png","avatar_image_url":"https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/143418/15842166/7c72db34-2c0b-11e6-9aed-b52498112777.png","action":{"name":"Open in GitHub","url":"https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website"}},"updates":{"snippets":[{"icon":"PERSON","message":"@floscher in #788: In the meantime, the wikidata tags with prefixes are used more frequently, with `operator:wikidata` and `name:etymology:wikidata` leading by far:\r\n\r\n| # | tag |\r\n| --- | --- |\r\n| 18 972 | operator:wikidata |\r\n| 14 838 | name:etymology:wikidata |\r\n| 580 | artist:wikidata |\r\n| 461 | subject:wikidata |\r\n| 457 | architect:wikidata |\r\n| 446 | species:wikidata |\r\n| 384 | brand:wikidata |\r\n| 307 | network:wikidata |\r\n| … | … |\r\n(Source: [TagInfo](https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=:wikidata), data from 2016-08-09 00:58 UTC)\r\n\r\nSo what do you think? Should we reconsider to add `name:etymology:wikidata`? I also like `species:wikidata` (e.g. for trees or other plants)."}],"action":{"name":"View Pull Request","url":"https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/pull/788#issuecomment-238527767"}}}</script>