<p>Sorry, I'm late to the discussion here...</p>

<p>First, this looks great! I'd be in favour of something like this being merged. It would be great to have it in cgimap too, especially if it's expected to be a high-traffic call. Any help with that would be very welcome. However, I don't think whether it's in cgimap should delay merging it to rails now.</p>

<p>It looks like the format <code>"#{id}v#{version},..." is backwards-compatible with the old</code>"#{id},..."<code>format. Would it make sense to implement this as an extension to the format allowed by</code>nodes?nodes=` and similar, rather than adding a new API endpoint?</p>

<p style="font-size:small;-webkit-text-size-adjust:none;color:#666;">—<br />You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.<br />Reply to this email directly, <a href="https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/pull/1189#issuecomment-240367770">view it on GitHub</a>, or <a href="https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABWnLeFT7mwLSdi_eUVDiQ9M3Ta9BV-_ks5qgttMgaJpZM4H0LgL">mute the thread</a>.<img alt="" height="1" src="https://github.com/notifications/beacon/ABWnLR13atwVzKBowoUDF-gcKJyjsDzhks5qgttMgaJpZM4H0LgL.gif" width="1" /></p>
<div itemscope itemtype="http://schema.org/EmailMessage">
<div itemprop="action" itemscope itemtype="http://schema.org/ViewAction">
  <link itemprop="url" href="https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/pull/1189#issuecomment-240367770"></link>
  <meta itemprop="name" content="View Pull Request"></meta>
</div>
<meta itemprop="description" content="View this Pull Request on GitHub"></meta>
</div>

<script type="application/json" data-scope="inboxmarkup">{"api_version":"1.0","publisher":{"api_key":"05dde50f1d1a384dd78767c55493e4bb","name":"GitHub"},"entity":{"external_key":"github/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website","title":"openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website","subtitle":"GitHub repository","main_image_url":"https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/143418/17495839/a5054eac-5d88-11e6-95fc-7290892c7bb5.png","avatar_image_url":"https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/143418/15842166/7c72db34-2c0b-11e6-9aed-b52498112777.png","action":{"name":"Open in GitHub","url":"https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website"}},"updates":{"snippets":[{"icon":"PERSON","message":"@zerebubuth in #1189: Sorry, I'm late to the discussion here...\r\n\r\nFirst, this looks great! I'd be in favour of something like this being merged. It would be great to have it in cgimap too, especially if it's expected to be a high-traffic call. Any help with that would be very welcome. However, I don't think whether it's in cgimap should delay merging it to rails now.\r\n\r\nIt looks like the format `\"#{id}v#{version},...\" is backwards-compatible with the old `\"#{id},...\"` format. Would it make sense to implement this as an extension to the format allowed by `nodes?nodes=` and similar, rather than adding a new API endpoint?"}],"action":{"name":"View Pull Request","url":"https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/pull/1189#issuecomment-240367770"}}}</script>