<p><a href="https://github.com/pnorman" class="user-mention">@pnorman</a> I agree that this is not optimal, but I didn't set the terms. I'm already trying to convince them to remove that statement from the permission letter, but I don't know if I will succeed.</p>
<p>What irritates me somewhat, however, is that there are some attributions on the <a href="https://www.openstreetmap.org/copyright">copyright page</a>, and this specific one gets rejected for a reason not quite clear to me. What sources are these that are on the list? "Important" ones? Who determines whether the source is "important" or not? Or did I miss something here?</p>

<p style="font-size:small;-webkit-text-size-adjust:none;color:#666;">—<br />You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.<br />Reply to this email directly, <a href="https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/pull/1480#issuecomment-285428970">view it on GitHub</a>, or <a href="https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABWnLa0EnxqaM3NC9FsgwOeXT7WQmxFeks5rkD2cgaJpZM4MXSM6">mute the thread</a>.<img alt="" height="1" src="https://github.com/notifications/beacon/ABWnLY-67UisJUX8PYW8Y4ccHr1e4myRks5rkD2cgaJpZM4MXSM6.gif" width="1" /></p>
<div itemscope itemtype="http://schema.org/EmailMessage">
<div itemprop="action" itemscope itemtype="http://schema.org/ViewAction">
  <link itemprop="url" href="https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/pull/1480#issuecomment-285428970"></link>
  <meta itemprop="name" content="View Pull Request"></meta>
</div>
<meta itemprop="description" content="View this Pull Request on GitHub"></meta>
</div>

<script type="application/json" data-scope="inboxmarkup">{"api_version":"1.0","publisher":{"api_key":"05dde50f1d1a384dd78767c55493e4bb","name":"GitHub"},"entity":{"external_key":"github/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website","title":"openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website","subtitle":"GitHub repository","main_image_url":"https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/143418/17495839/a5054eac-5d88-11e6-95fc-7290892c7bb5.png","avatar_image_url":"https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/143418/15842166/7c72db34-2c0b-11e6-9aed-b52498112777.png","action":{"name":"Open in GitHub","url":"https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website"}},"updates":{"snippets":[{"icon":"PERSON","message":"@thomaskonrad in #1480: @pnorman I agree that this is not optimal, but I didn't set the terms. I'm already trying to convince them to remove that statement from the permission letter, but I don't know if I will succeed.\r\n\r\nWhat irritates me somewhat, however, is that there are some attributions on the [copyright page](https://www.openstreetmap.org/copyright), and this specific one gets rejected for a reason not quite clear to me. What sources are these that are on the list? \"Important\" ones? Who determines whether the source is \"important\" or not? Or did I miss something here?"}],"action":{"name":"View Pull Request","url":"https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/pull/1480#issuecomment-285428970"}}}</script>