<p><a href="https://github.com/woodpeck" class="user-mention">@woodpeck</a> I agree almost completely with you. We are adding information to the changesets to help other users to prioritize which edits should receive attention and be reviewed. We removed the word "suspicion" from the frontend in the hope that the users don't see it as an accusation.</p>
<p>We only flag users that have more than one block, so if someone had a misconfiguration in his email address and received only one block, it'll not affect him. The third case you mentioned shouldn't really be treated as more "suspicious", although I believe this block case in an exception.</p>
<p>Moreover, I think you'll agree that communication is an important aspect in a collaborative project and users must care about have a correct email configured and answer other contributors questions.</p>
<p style="font-size:small;-webkit-text-size-adjust:none;color:#666;">—<br />You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.<br />Reply to this email directly, <a href="https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/issues/1618#issuecomment-324721013">view it on GitHub</a>, or <a href="https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABWnLRDw_z25MiSAoaTTm8ZqyLN74tEQks5sbcNTgaJpZM4PBfE2">mute the thread</a>.<img alt="" height="1" src="https://github.com/notifications/beacon/ABWnLRfZVJ5f4ZWXVa4YYeCLdHy6-x14ks5sbcNTgaJpZM4PBfE2.gif" width="1" /></p>
<div itemscope itemtype="http://schema.org/EmailMessage">
<div itemprop="action" itemscope itemtype="http://schema.org/ViewAction">
<link itemprop="url" href="https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/issues/1618#issuecomment-324721013"></link>
<meta itemprop="name" content="View Issue"></meta>
</div>
<meta itemprop="description" content="View this Issue on GitHub"></meta>
</div>
<script type="application/json" data-scope="inboxmarkup">{"api_version":"1.0","publisher":{"api_key":"05dde50f1d1a384dd78767c55493e4bb","name":"GitHub"},"entity":{"external_key":"github/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website","title":"openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website","subtitle":"GitHub repository","main_image_url":"https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/143418/17495839/a5054eac-5d88-11e6-95fc-7290892c7bb5.png","avatar_image_url":"https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/143418/15842166/7c72db34-2c0b-11e6-9aed-b52498112777.png","action":{"name":"Open in GitHub","url":"https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website"}},"updates":{"snippets":[{"icon":"PERSON","message":"@willemarcel in #1618: @woodpeck I agree almost completely with you. We are adding information to the changesets to help other users to prioritize which edits should receive attention and be reviewed. We removed the word \"suspicion\" from the frontend in the hope that the users don't see it as an accusation.\r\n\r\nWe only flag users that have more than one block, so if someone had a misconfiguration in his email address and received only one block, it'll not affect him. The third case you mentioned shouldn't really be treated as more \"suspicious\", although I believe this block case in an exception.\r\n\r\nMoreover, I think you'll agree that communication is an important aspect in a collaborative project and users must care about have a correct email configured and answer other contributors questions."}],"action":{"name":"View Issue","url":"https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/issues/1618#issuecomment-324721013"}}}</script>