<p><a href="https://github.com/karussell" class="user-mention">@karussell</a> My logic is that where the routing service being used is the commercial version, with the same routing rules (and potentially additional third party data) then we should name it as what it is, namely the name of the commercial service.</p>
<p>If it's just using the same software but is otherwise independent then I have no problem using the name of the software, as we have been doing with OSM until now.</p>

<p style="font-size:small;-webkit-text-size-adjust:none;color:#666;">—<br />You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.<br />Reply to this email directly, <a href="https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/pull/1637#issuecomment-333465876">view it on GitHub</a>, or <a href="https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABWnLSj1AF_U95YFSRjc300mx91XyKwNks5soJiDgaJpZM4PSDUx">mute the thread</a>.<img alt="" height="1" src="https://github.com/notifications/beacon/ABWnLSKfmDJlwO-LMuNMh6nrN7C1cLx1ks5soJiDgaJpZM4PSDUx.gif" width="1" /></p>
<div itemscope itemtype="http://schema.org/EmailMessage">
<div itemprop="action" itemscope itemtype="http://schema.org/ViewAction">
  <link itemprop="url" href="https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/pull/1637#issuecomment-333465876"></link>
  <meta itemprop="name" content="View Pull Request"></meta>
</div>
<meta itemprop="description" content="View this Pull Request on GitHub"></meta>
</div>

<script type="application/json" data-scope="inboxmarkup">{"api_version":"1.0","publisher":{"api_key":"05dde50f1d1a384dd78767c55493e4bb","name":"GitHub"},"entity":{"external_key":"github/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website","title":"openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website","subtitle":"GitHub repository","main_image_url":"https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/143418/17495839/a5054eac-5d88-11e6-95fc-7290892c7bb5.png","avatar_image_url":"https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/143418/15842166/7c72db34-2c0b-11e6-9aed-b52498112777.png","action":{"name":"Open in GitHub","url":"https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website"}},"updates":{"snippets":[{"icon":"PERSON","message":"@tomhughes in #1637: @karussell My logic is that where the routing service being used is the commercial version, with the same routing rules (and potentially additional third party data) then we should name it as what it is, namely the name of the commercial service.\r\n\r\nIf it's just using the same software but is otherwise independent then I have no problem using the name of the software, as we have been doing with OSM until now."}],"action":{"name":"View Pull Request","url":"https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/pull/1637#issuecomment-333465876"}}}</script>