<p><a class="user-mention" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/hovercards?user_id=147741" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/tomhughes">@tomhughes</a>, <a class="user-mention" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/hovercards?user_id=360803" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/gravitystorm">@gravitystorm</a> - as the maintainers for this, I assume that you're not happy to implement the proposal, given the degree of discussion. What would you need to be comfortable to implement the change? For example, I could follow the <a href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal_process" rel="nofollow">https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal_process</a>. This would allow people to offer (rational) arguments as to why OLC in the OSM search may be good or may be bad. The 'community' could be then notified (via mailing list) that this proposal is active, allowing a wider range of people to voice opinions?</p>
<p><em>("OSM is powered by its Community. Engage positively with the Community, be a good and respectful neighbour and assume good intent." <a href="https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Mission_Statement" rel="nofollow">https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Mission_Statement</a>)</em></p>
<p style="font-size:small;-webkit-text-size-adjust:none;color:#666;">—<br />You are receiving this because you commented.<br />Reply to this email directly, <a href="https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/issues/1807#issuecomment-451470343">view it on GitHub</a>, or <a href="https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABWnLR8zImBBYtQzVx7sDEQ1dtZtpMSYks5u_28ggaJpZM4TDycy">mute the thread</a>.<img src="https://github.com/notifications/beacon/ABWnLbmcVaoZVPOH7wp8hKaQUZHqtzXpks5u_28ggaJpZM4TDycy.gif" height="1" width="1" alt="" /></p>
<script type="application/json" data-scope="inboxmarkup">{"api_version":"1.0","publisher":{"api_key":"05dde50f1d1a384dd78767c55493e4bb","name":"GitHub"},"entity":{"external_key":"github/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website","title":"openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website","subtitle":"GitHub repository","main_image_url":"https://github.githubassets.com/images/email/message_cards/header.png","avatar_image_url":"https://github.githubassets.com/images/email/message_cards/avatar.png","action":{"name":"Open in GitHub","url":"https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website"}},"updates":{"snippets":[{"icon":"PERSON","message":"@bjohas in #1807: @tomhughes, @gravitystorm - as the maintainers for this, I assume that you're not happy to implement the proposal, given the degree of discussion. What would you need to be comfortable to implement the change? For example, I could follow the https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal_process. This would allow people to offer (rational) arguments as to why OLC in the OSM search may be good or may be bad. The 'community' could be then notified (via mailing list) that this proposal is active, allowing a wider range of people to voice opinions?\r\n\r\n_(\"OSM is powered by its Community. Engage positively with the Community, be a good and respectful neighbour and assume good intent.\" https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Mission_Statement)_"}],"action":{"name":"View Issue","url":"https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/issues/1807#issuecomment-451470343"}}}</script>
<script type="application/ld+json">[
{
"@context": "http://schema.org",
"@type": "EmailMessage",
"potentialAction": {
"@type": "ViewAction",
"target": "https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/issues/1807#issuecomment-451470343",
"url": "https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/issues/1807#issuecomment-451470343",
"name": "View Issue"
},
"description": "View this Issue on GitHub",
"publisher": {
"@type": "Organization",
"name": "GitHub",
"url": "https://github.com"
}
}
]</script>