<p></p>
<p>Could someone kindly clarify what the way forward is on getting the copyright statement updated? (I regret I wasn't totally clear from Andy's posting, not being familiar with how things are set up.) It seems pretty critical to me that the tiles are being advertised as the wrong license now in something as important as the copyright statement.</p>
<p>(I know that reviewers at PLOS are still rejecting author maps unnecessarily because it states these are still the old license.)</p>

<p style="font-size:small;-webkit-text-size-adjust:none;color:#666;">—<br />You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.<br />Reply to this email directly, <a href="https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/pull/2905#issuecomment-717315012">view it on GitHub</a>, or <a href="https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAK2OLPGG75HICF774KQWY3SM3P37ANCNFSM4S6S2GDA">unsubscribe</a>.<img src="https://github.com/notifications/beacon/AAK2OLJQPMWTE6TLQK3NVD3SM3P37A5CNFSM4S6S2GDKYY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOFLAVXRA.gif" height="1" width="1" alt="" /></p>
<script type="application/ld+json">[
{
"@context": "http://schema.org",
"@type": "EmailMessage",
"potentialAction": {
"@type": "ViewAction",
"target": "https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/pull/2905#issuecomment-717315012",
"url": "https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/pull/2905#issuecomment-717315012",
"name": "View Pull Request"
},
"description": "View this Pull Request on GitHub",
"publisher": {
"@type": "Organization",
"name": "GitHub",
"url": "https://github.com"
}
}
]</script>