<p></p>
<blockquote>
<p>Is going SVG only safe from a compatibility point of view? Everywhere where we have used SVG to date we have done so using a <code>picture</code> element with a PNG fallback.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Going SVG only is very safe from a compatibility point of view. Browsers support for SVG is <a href="https://caniuse.com/svg" rel="nofollow">99.82% on desktop and 100% on mobile</a>. There's just no practical reason to need the fallback method as that would mean needing to maintain both the vector and raster image.</p>

<p style="font-size:small;-webkit-text-size-adjust:none;color:#666;">—<br />You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.<br />Reply to this email directly, <a href="https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/pull/2960#issuecomment-730176113">view it on GitHub</a>, or <a href="https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAK2OLN7UDXCKDHR5NGNYP3SQS76NANCNFSM4TVKA75Q">unsubscribe</a>.<img src="https://github.com/notifications/beacon/AAK2OLLSCDE3UJ4RY2WM4ODSQS76NA5CNFSM4TVKA752YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOFOCZU4I.gif" height="1" width="1" alt="" /></p>
<script type="application/ld+json">[
{
"@context": "http://schema.org",
"@type": "EmailMessage",
"potentialAction": {
"@type": "ViewAction",
"target": "https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/pull/2960#issuecomment-730176113",
"url": "https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/pull/2960#issuecomment-730176113",
"name": "View Pull Request"
},
"description": "View this Pull Request on GitHub",
"publisher": {
"@type": "Organization",
"name": "GitHub",
"url": "https://github.com"
}
}
]</script>