<p></p>
<p dir="auto"><a class="user-mention" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/mikelmaron/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/mikelmaron">@mikelmaron</a></p>
<blockquote>
<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">While OSMCha is a tool which I generally like, it's also v0, meaning that the developers think it's not yet ready for prime-time (which would be v1+).</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">I don't think that's quite accurate and depends on what's meant by "prime-time". It's very much in production shape now.</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">From <a href="http://www.catb.org/esr/writings/taoup/" rel="nofollow"><em>The Art of Unix Programming</em></a> (§ Part Ⅲ. Implementation § Chapter 16. Reuse) § <a href="http://www.catb.org/esr/writings/taoup/html/ch16s04.html" rel="nofollow">The Best Things in Life Are Open</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">…<br>
…. A major consequent difference between open-source practice and elsewhere is that a release level of 1.0 actually means the software is ready to use. In fact, a version number of 0.90 or above is a fairly reliable signal that the code is production-ready, but the developers are not quite ready to bet their reputations on it.<br>
…</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">Authored by Eric Raymond. The same author of <em>The Cathedral and the Bazaar</em>.</p>
<p dir="auto">I didn't state that <em>I</em> thought it wasn't ready for non-experimental usage, but that the <em>developers</em> didn't yet think it was (by their own standards).<br>
Re-read my original.</p>
<p dir="auto">However, when fixes to mobile layout occurred only recently (v0.84, if I recall) … well, QED methinks.</p>
<p dir="auto">More often, version<1 is a comment on feature-completeness, rather than reliability, robustness, refinement (debugging) & such.</p>
<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">That would need some thinking […] -- particularly assessing usage volume and making sure infrastructure is in place …</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">See above <g-emoji class="g-emoji" alias="smile" fallback-src="https://github.githubassets.com/images/icons/emoji/unicode/1f604.png">😄</g-emoji>.</p>

<p style="font-size:small;-webkit-text-size-adjust:none;color:#666;">—<br />Reply to this email directly, <a href="https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/issues/3242#issuecomment-1006920853">view it on GitHub</a>, or <a href="https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAK2OLPAXMEDE3737JJPS7TUUX5EXANCNFSM47VPTUVA">unsubscribe</a>.<br />Triage notifications on the go with GitHub Mobile for <a href="https://apps.apple.com/app/apple-store/id1477376905?ct=notification-email&mt=8&pt=524675">iOS</a> or <a href="https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.github.android&referrer=utm_campaign%3Dnotification-email%26utm_medium%3Demail%26utm_source%3Dgithub">Android</a>.
<br />You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.<img src="https://github.com/notifications/beacon/AAK2OLI2ZUK4QIB2TSR2QGDUUX5EXA5CNFSM47VPTUVKYY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOHQCGJFI.gif" height="1" width="1" alt="" /><span style="color: transparent; font-size: 0; display: none; visibility: hidden; overflow: hidden; opacity: 0; width: 0; height: 0; max-width: 0; max-height: 0; mso-hide: all">Message ID: <span><openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/issues/3242/1006920853</span><span>@</span><span>github</span><span>.</span><span>com></span></span></p>
<script type="application/ld+json">[
{
"@context": "http://schema.org",
"@type": "EmailMessage",
"potentialAction": {
"@type": "ViewAction",
"target": "https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/issues/3242#issuecomment-1006920853",
"url": "https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/issues/3242#issuecomment-1006920853",
"name": "View Issue"
},
"description": "View this Issue on GitHub",
"publisher": {
"@type": "Organization",
"name": "GitHub",
"url": "https://github.com"
}
}
]</script>