<p></p>
<p dir="auto">With the decision tree like this:</p>
<p dir="auto">For each layer:<br>
If light mode active use standard<br>
If darkURL (dark tiles) use that<br>
If local (layer-spanning) filter preference use that<br>
If cartographers choice filter use that<br>
Else default to <code class="notranslate">filter: none</code></p>
<p dir="auto">That would leave the user with at least four choices:</p>
<ul dir="auto">
<li>Autodark (cartographers choice)</li>
<li>Light (no filter)</li>
<li>Dimmed (brightness/gamma filter)</li>
<li>Dark (invert/hue-rotate)</li>
</ul>
<p dir="auto">Focusing on making these presets great may eliminate the need for micro-controls entirely.</p>
<p dir="auto">However, four additional entries in the context menu like proposed in <a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="2287822763" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/issues/4777" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/pull/4777/hovercard" href="https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/pull/4777">#4777</a> (following the predecessor of this discussion) seems to be too wasteful of the little space the map occupies on mobile already, I agree with @‌pkrasicki that the layer flyout panel is a better place for the radio buttons.</p>

<p style="font-size:small;-webkit-text-size-adjust:none;color:#666;">—<br />Reply to this email directly, <a href="https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/issues/5328#issuecomment-2491761092">view it on GitHub</a>, or <a href="https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAK2OLMJN6DFLLLDHJCFBQD2BYFM7AVCNFSM6AAAAABR3CJSAOVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDIOJRG43DCMBZGI">unsubscribe</a>.<br />You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.<img src="https://github.com/notifications/beacon/AAK2OLPL63TTSXFDVR37YUL2BYFM7A5CNFSM6AAAAABR3CJSAOWGG33NNVSW45C7OR4XAZNMJFZXG5LFINXW23LFNZ2KUY3PNVWWK3TUL5UWJTUUQVA4I.gif" height="1" width="1" alt="" /><span style="color: transparent; font-size: 0; display: none; visibility: hidden; overflow: hidden; opacity: 0; width: 0; height: 0; max-width: 0; max-height: 0; mso-hide: all">Message ID: <span><openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/issues/5328/2491761092</span><span>@</span><span>github</span><span>.</span><span>com></span></span></p>
<script type="application/ld+json">[
{
"@context": "http://schema.org",
"@type": "EmailMessage",
"potentialAction": {
"@type": "ViewAction",
"target": "https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/issues/5328#issuecomment-2491761092",
"url": "https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/issues/5328#issuecomment-2491761092",
"name": "View Issue"
},
"description": "View this Issue on GitHub",
"publisher": {
"@type": "Organization",
"name": "GitHub",
"url": "https://github.com"
}
}
]</script>