<span style="color: transparent; display: none; height: 0; max-height: 0; max-width: 0; opacity: 0; overflow: hidden; mso-hide: all; visibility: hidden; width: 0;">
  <p dir="auto">Do we just change the language from "accept" the ToU to "confirm that you read", or did we go from <em>mandatory</em> acceptance to <em>automatic</em> acceptance since <a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="372213482" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/issues/2028" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/pull/2028/hovercard?comment_id=439124390&comment_type=issue_comment" href="https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/pull/2028#issuecomment-439124390">#2028 (comment)</a>? With automatic acceptance we don't need to make any GDPR-related changes because whenever you use the data you "accept" the ToU and get all of the associated "rights". But obviously that's not what those who want GDPR-changes think. EWG, for example, asked me recently if I plan to "make accepting the terms of use a requirement". They think the ToU need to be "accepted". Now it may be the case that what EWG thinks is not the same what the current LWG thinks about all this.</p>
<p dir="auto">Alternatively we can ignore all of this, forget about the ToU and use the current Privacy policy as a guide, see <a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="2921894706" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/issues/5804" data-hovercard-type="issue" data-hovercard-url="/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/issues/5804/hovercard?comment_id=2726403892&comment_type=issue_comment" href="https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/issues/5804#issuecomment-2726403892">#5804 (comment)</a> minus the github argument. Show some things only to logged in users and ignore the <code class="notranslate">tou_agreed</code> attribute. Then this pull request is not very useful and so is <a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="372213482" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/issues/2028" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/pull/2028/hovercard" href="https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/pull/2028">#2028</a> from 2019, aside from adding links to the terms pages.</p><p style="font-size:small;-webkit-text-size-adjust:none;color:#666;">—<br />Reply to this email directly, <a href="https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/pull/5706#issuecomment-2755078107">view it on GitHub</a>, or <a href="https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAK2OLJZSQRVDV3PIB3XL7T2WLK43AVCNFSM6AAAAABXNHXYU2VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDONJVGA3TQMJQG4">unsubscribe</a>.<br />You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.<img src="https://github.com/notifications/beacon/AAK2OLJHQ5PCSZDA7TI3WRD2WLK43A5CNFSM6AAAAABXNHXYU2WGG33NNVSW45C7OR4XAZNMJFZXG5LFINXW23LFNZ2KUY3PNVWWK3TUL5UWJTVEG4T5W.gif" height="1" width="1" alt="" /><span style="color: transparent; font-size: 0; display: none; visibility: hidden; overflow: hidden; opacity: 0; width: 0; height: 0; max-width: 0; max-height: 0; mso-hide: all">Message ID: <span><openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/pull/5706/c2755078107</span><span>@</span><span>github</span><span>.</span><span>com></span></span></p>
</span>


<div style="display: flex; flex-wrap: wrap; white-space: pre-wrap; align-items: center; "><img alt="AntonKhorev" height="20" width="20" style="border-radius:50%; margin-right: 4px;" decoding="async" src="https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/4158490?s=20&v=4" /><strong>AntonKhorev</strong> left a comment <a href="https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/pull/5706#issuecomment-2755078107">(openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website#5706)</a></div>
<p dir="auto">Do we just change the language from "accept" the ToU to "confirm that you read", or did we go from <em>mandatory</em> acceptance to <em>automatic</em> acceptance since <a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="372213482" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/issues/2028" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/pull/2028/hovercard?comment_id=439124390&comment_type=issue_comment" href="https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/pull/2028#issuecomment-439124390">#2028 (comment)</a>? With automatic acceptance we don't need to make any GDPR-related changes because whenever you use the data you "accept" the ToU and get all of the associated "rights". But obviously that's not what those who want GDPR-changes think. EWG, for example, asked me recently if I plan to "make accepting the terms of use a requirement". They think the ToU need to be "accepted". Now it may be the case that what EWG thinks is not the same what the current LWG thinks about all this.</p>
<p dir="auto">Alternatively we can ignore all of this, forget about the ToU and use the current Privacy policy as a guide, see <a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="2921894706" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/issues/5804" data-hovercard-type="issue" data-hovercard-url="/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/issues/5804/hovercard?comment_id=2726403892&comment_type=issue_comment" href="https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/issues/5804#issuecomment-2726403892">#5804 (comment)</a> minus the github argument. Show some things only to logged in users and ignore the <code class="notranslate">tou_agreed</code> attribute. Then this pull request is not very useful and so is <a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="372213482" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/issues/2028" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/pull/2028/hovercard" href="https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/pull/2028">#2028</a> from 2019, aside from adding links to the terms pages.</p>

<p style="font-size:small;-webkit-text-size-adjust:none;color:#666;">—<br />Reply to this email directly, <a href="https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/pull/5706#issuecomment-2755078107">view it on GitHub</a>, or <a href="https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAK2OLJZSQRVDV3PIB3XL7T2WLK43AVCNFSM6AAAAABXNHXYU2VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDONJVGA3TQMJQG4">unsubscribe</a>.<br />You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.<img src="https://github.com/notifications/beacon/AAK2OLJHQ5PCSZDA7TI3WRD2WLK43A5CNFSM6AAAAABXNHXYU2WGG33NNVSW45C7OR4XAZNMJFZXG5LFINXW23LFNZ2KUY3PNVWWK3TUL5UWJTVEG4T5W.gif" height="1" width="1" alt="" /><span style="color: transparent; font-size: 0; display: none; visibility: hidden; overflow: hidden; opacity: 0; width: 0; height: 0; max-width: 0; max-height: 0; mso-hide: all">Message ID: <span><openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/pull/5706/c2755078107</span><span>@</span><span>github</span><span>.</span><span>com></span></span></p>

<script type="application/ld+json">[
{
"@context": "http://schema.org",
"@type": "EmailMessage",
"potentialAction": {
"@type": "ViewAction",
"target": "https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/pull/5706#issuecomment-2755078107",
"url": "https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/pull/5706#issuecomment-2755078107",
"name": "View Pull Request"
},
"description": "View this Pull Request on GitHub",
"publisher": {
"@type": "Organization",
"name": "GitHub",
"url": "https://github.com"
}
}
]</script>