<div style="display: flex; flex-wrap: wrap; white-space: pre-wrap; align-items: center; "><img height="20" width="20" style="border-radius:50%; margin-right: 4px;" decoding="async" src="https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/1557529?s=20&v=4" /><strong>larouxn</strong> left a comment <a href="https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/pull/6333#issuecomment-3206916969">(openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website#6333)</a></div>
<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">So we switched to using <a href="https://github.com/fullstaq-ruby/server-edition">https://github.com/fullstaq-ruby/server-edition</a> and once we did that there was little reason not to use the latest version.</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">TIL this is a thing. Neat! 👍</p>
<p dir="auto">Am I understanding correctly that production is running Ruby 3.4.5 but development for which Docker is encouraged is using Ruby 3.2 re: below?</p>
<p dir="auto"><a href="https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/blob/d85d1309c1ed1f14b5ee300ef0b182c725940d35/Dockerfile#L1">https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/blob/d85d1309c1ed1f14b5ee300ef0b182c725940d35/Dockerfile#L1</a></p>
<p dir="auto">I understand supporting non-EOL Rubies (3.2, 3.3, 3.4) but should this be bumped to <a href="https://hub.docker.com/layers/library/ruby/3.4-bookworm/images/sha256-1390a133776f76f63d3e99d9c45b5f3353b1af41044024ff8098a5cd993c97cb" rel="nofollow">3.4-bookerworm</a>? That would actually better accomplish what this PR was trying to do since it synchronizes development and production Ruby versions.</p>

<p style="font-size:small;-webkit-text-size-adjust:none;color:#666;">—<br />Reply to this email directly, <a href="https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/pull/6333#issuecomment-3206916969">view it on GitHub</a>, or <a href="https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAK2OLOZ22VZBS7JNMS7ROD3OSI3DAVCNFSM6AAAAACEFLIYGCVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZTEMBWHEYTMOJWHE">unsubscribe</a>.<br />You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.<img src="https://github.com/notifications/beacon/AAK2OLM4FCEPVTP4CD4ZPXL3OSI3DA5CNFSM6AAAAACEFLIYGCWGG33NNVSW45C7OR4XAZNMJFZXG5LFINXW23LFNZ2KUY3PNVWWK3TUL5UWJTV7EWVWS.gif" height="1" width="1" alt="" /><span style="color: transparent; font-size: 0; display: none; visibility: hidden; overflow: hidden; opacity: 0; width: 0; height: 0; max-width: 0; max-height: 0; mso-hide: all">Message ID: <span><openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/pull/6333/c3206916969</span><span>@</span><span>github</span><span>.</span><span>com></span></span></p>

<script type="application/ld+json">[
{
"@context": "http://schema.org",
"@type": "EmailMessage",
"potentialAction": {
"@type": "ViewAction",
"target": "https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/pull/6333#issuecomment-3206916969",
"url": "https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/pull/6333#issuecomment-3206916969",
"name": "View Pull Request"
},
"description": "View this Pull Request on GitHub",
"publisher": {
"@type": "Organization",
"name": "GitHub",
"url": "https://github.com"
}
}
]</script>