[Rebuild] Pavel's changesets
"Petr Morávek [Xificurk]"
xificurk at gmail.com
Thu Apr 5 11:25:57 BST 2012
I've added the incompatible changesets to the list.
Now, to the second part - I'm not sure how quickly will Pavel reply and
change the license status in his OSM profile. And I'm not sure how far
in the license change process we already are. It would be unfortunate if
his contributions, that he agreed to relicense, were removed just
because he's busy and didn't get to the email/web.
What can be done to ensure that his contributions (except the ones
listed in "Tainted changesets") will survive the license change?
Petr Morávek aka Xificurk
Simon Poole wrote:
> There is a list of incompatbile changesets here:
> IMHO the best would be for Pavel to accept, but that naturally depends
> on him.
> Am 04.04.2012 11:53, schrieb "Petr Morávek [Xificurk]":
>> "Petr Morávek [Xificurk]" wrote:
>>> I went through Pavel's changesets and I think I've found all the tainted
>>> data. Here is what I did:
>>> 1) I went through Pavel's changesets (except the big ones already
>>> identified as ODbL compatible imports).
>>> 2) Counted the number of created or modified nodes that had tags place=*
>>> or railway=station,halt,tram_stop. This gave me 17 changesets that have
>>> at least 10 such nodes.
>>> 3) Then I checked them manually and identified the mass imports.
>>> Pavel's tainted changesets incompatible with ODbL+CT:
>>> 720911, 720263, 187327, 189654, 188101, 197352, 593595
>>> Special case of changeset 473203: contains mostly import of forests, but
>>> also 12 place nodes from wikipedia,etc., only 3 of them (277999916,
>>> 277999934, 277999939) are still in the database. I would suggest we keep
>>> this changeset and remove only those 3 offending nodes when the database
>>> comes from read-only mode.
>>> In the process I've found another changeset with import of places from
>>> wikipedia,geonames,etc. performed by Bilbo. This should be marked for
>>> removal as well:
>> I've deleted the incompatible nodes. Now, I wonder what's going to
>> happen next?
>> Will Pavel accept ODbL+CT in his profile? Or is it no longer possible?
>> As far as I know there isn't a list of incompatible changesets yet (only
>> the other way around - list of compatible changesets of decliners). But
>> we need it at least because of the Bilbo's changeset 312633. Where
>> should this be directed?
>> Once Pavel's account is marked ODbL+CT compatible and the new list with
>> incompatible changesets (total 8 changesets),
>> 720911, 720263, 187327, 189654, 188101, 197352, 593595, 312633,
>> is set into place, we no longer need to override Pavel's other bulk
>> imports listed on .
>> Best regards,
>> Petr Morávek aka Xificurk
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 262 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
More information about the Rebuild