[Rebuild] Meeting to discuss first steps towards rebuild plan
toffehoff at gmail.com
Sun Feb 19 18:55:41 GMT 2012
I think I do not have to add much to the meeting, so I'm not going to dail in.
Just so you all know, we have had a Management Team meeting yesterday. The minutes can be found here:
The meeting had also discussed the "gradual change" process and it found it a preferable process. We didn't discuss if from technical perspective. That's left to the rebuild-team: being you all.
Hope you all have good constructive meeting!
Op 19 feb. 2012, om 17:30 heeft Dermot McNally het volgende geschreven:
> On 19 February 2012 07:40, Frederik Ramm <frederik at remote.org> wrote:
>> We should make sure that any code being discussed is in plain view for the
>> involved (code doesn't travel well through a phone line).
> The code I had in mind is Matt's, so he can best determine whether it
> goes beyond ideas that have already been discussed - I'm thinking in
> particular of the in-place database change model that you posted based
> on Matt's ideas.
>> I think that an important issue to discuss is whether or not we want to opt
>> for the "continuous rebuild" idea and what positive and negative side
>> effects there would be.
> +50000, for me this is one of the bigger "decisions" to take now. I
> use quotes because I expect that, even if we think the continuous
> option will work (and clearly I'm a big fan of it) and even if we
> decide to try it out, by experimenting with it now rather than later
> we allow ourselves to freedom to fail early and cheap if there turn
> out to be snags that can't be fixed.
> Talk to you all later,
> Igaühel on siin oma laul
> ja ma oma ei leiagi üles
> Rebuild mailing list
> Rebuild at openstreetmap.org
More information about the Rebuild