<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
<title></title>
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#ffffff">
On 2012-02-26 17:38, <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:waldo000000@gmail.com">waldo000000@gmail.com</a> wrote:
<blockquote
cite="mid:CANE7HziE5NWK9tMpwFWRDM=7XJN+ThOcGzswOu9pXNHu34vL5Q@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 1:09 PM,
Frederik Ramm <span dir="ltr"><<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:frederik@remote.org">frederik@remote.org</a>></span>
wrote:
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt
0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204);
padding-left: 1ex;">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt
0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204);
padding-left: 1ex;">
What about a relation where /some /members were added by
decliners? Just<br>
remove those members,<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
Yes...
<div class="im">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt
0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204);
padding-left: 1ex;">
or flag it somehow<br>
as needing re-verification?<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
</div>
This is something we haven't yet talked about.<br>
</blockquote>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>I think this is very important. Removing members from a
relation in some (most?) cases will cause the relation to
become invalid/misleading/wrong. Arguably, it would be
better to remove the entire relation than to leave a
misleading/crippled one!</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
A relation missing only few members can be repaired rather easily.
Sometimes there is just one possible path between the endpoints of a
gap, this can be fixed by armchair mappers. When it's not clear what
ways belong to the relation only a smaller part needs to be
resurveyed instead of the complete route. Deleting the whole
relation could be seen as vandalism. Let there be a 100km hiking
route where all members and tags are clean except for 10 Ways in a
town which were added to the route by a decliner. Resurveying this
town can be done very quickly and the route is still usable.<br>
The worst case would be a single way split by a decliner which would
then cause the whole relation to be deleted. This is not acceptable
to me.<br>
</body>
</html>