dermotm at gmail.com
Sun Jan 29 23:55:02 GMT 2012
As requested by Mikel following Friday's IRC meeting, I will add below
the additional items we agreed should be on our SWG plan for the year:
On 27 January 2012 16:16, Mikel Maron <mikel_maron at yahoo.com> wrote:
> From the Board Face to Face meeting in Seattle in October, some goals were
> laid out.
> ACTION: Henk have AoA ready for vote before 1 April 2012
> ACTION: SWG needs to review “Memorandum of Association”
> ACTION: Dermot to get SWG to explore Core Values
> Dermot did some work on values and goals (which got interesting)
For plan: Finish the work that has begun, attempt to find consensus on
the Core Value suggestions to date:
> And RichardF was working on sorting through the trawl of Suggestions.
> Other Policy work that might be needed over the year, but not sure what
> might fall in our lap.
Additional items for plan:
Arising once again because of the switch2osm campaign: Confront the
issue of where users wishing to use OSM instead of other providers
should get their services. Base assumption (also for discussion): That
there should be suitable map services for such users, that it should
be a strategic goal to ensure this become so. This is without
prejudice to the question of who should operate the services.
May I request that others who were present augment these points if you
feel I've omitted something important from the meeting.
More information about the Strategic