<html><body><div style="color:#000; background-color:#fff; font-family:times new roman, new york, times, serif;font-size:12pt"><div><span>Hey Strategic<br></span></div><br><div><blockquote style="border-left: 2px solid rgb(16, 16, 255); margin-left: 5px; padding-left: 5px;"><div class="yui_3_2_0_37_131458556648967" style="font-family: times new roman,new york,times,serif; font-size: 12pt;"><div class="yui_3_2_0_37_131458556648969" style="font-family: times new roman,new york,times,serif; font-size: 12pt;"><font size="2" face="Arial">----- Forwarded Message -----<br><b><span style="font-weight:bold;">From:</span></b> Harry Wood <mail@harrywood.co.uk><br><b><span style="font-weight: bold;"></span></b></font><br>Do we want to copy across a more fleshed out definition of the Strategy Working Group? From the google doc? or from the osm wiki here: <a href="http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Strategic_working_group"
target="_blank">http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Strategic_working_group</a> ?<br><br></div></div></blockquote>Harry is cleaning up Working Group definitions for the OSMF website.</div><div><br></div><div>We currently have this from the London face to face (just search for Strategic WG) http://bit.ly/kcWel8<div style="font-family: times new roman, new york, times, serif; font-size: 12pt;"><div style="font-family: times new roman, new york, times, serif; font-size: 12pt;">There's also lots of text from the wiki.<br><br>Any comments? Are we more or less happy with the gdoc version?<br><br>Thanks<br>Mikel<br></div></div></div></div></body></html>