osm at inbox.org
Wed Dec 9 14:31:51 GMT 2009
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 5:29 AM, Steve Bennett <stevagewp at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 9:10 PM, Richard Mann <
> richard.mann.westoxford at googlemail.com> wrote:
>> Steve - dip your toe in the Smoothness debate on the wiki, and recoil with
>> horror that people have devoted so much time to arguing over suitability
> Heh, I've only seen the results of it so far. How on earth did they come up
> with "very horrible"? :) The best thing is, the photos of "very horrible"
> look "very mild" to me, compared to some of the really bad surfaces out
And that's what happens when you try to map suitability.
As I've said before, I have absolutely no idea how suitable a particular way
is for bicycling. I can usually tell you the surface, though, and let you
(or a computer algorithm) decide based on that.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Tagging