[Tagging] tagging single trees
dieterdreist at gmail.com
Tue Sep 7 08:23:01 BST 2010
2010/9/7 NopMap <ekkehart at gmx.de>:
> I dont't think so. Considering that 75% of the trees are from only 3 users,
> they could be quickly fixed.
IMHO tagging ordinary trees as "non-significant _or_ not lone" (which
is the wiki definition) is an absurdity. If we cannot agree on tagging
special trees in a special way but the opposite this topic will
continue to annoy and you will have continuously to complain about
trees tagged the wrong way...
More information about the Tagging