[Tagging] inconsistencies in bridge
dieterdreist at gmail.com
Mon Sep 27 17:10:29 BST 2010
2010/9/27 Lennard <ldp at xs4all.nl>:
> On 27-9-2010 16:25, Noel David Torres Taño wrote:
>> What about abandoned=yes ?
> And expect every data consumer to have to parse that in addition to whatever
> bridge=* value you leave on the data. What's not there anymore is just that:
> not there anymore. It doesn't deserve a bridge=* tag.
exactly. As long as it is a bridge (abandoned or not), it is a bridge.
Otherwise it might be ruins or sth. similar, but not a bridge.
You could tag ruins=bridge for this.
I also have an example for this, where abandoned would probably be not
More information about the Tagging